Longitudinal changes in anxiety and psychological distress, and associated risk and protective factors during the first three months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany

• Main Authors: Antonia Bendau, Jens Plag, Stefanie Kunas, Sarah Wyka, Andreas Ströhle, Moritz Bruno Petzold
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
• Series: Brain and Behavior
• Subjects: Corona; depression; mental disorder; mental health; Sars‐CoV‐2
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1964

Abstract Background The COVID‐19 pandemic is related to multiple stressors and therefore may be associated with psychological distress. The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess symptoms of (un‐)specific anxiety and depression along different stages of the pandemic to generate knowledge about the progress of psychological consequences of the pandemic and to test the role of potential risk and resilience factors that were derived from cross‐sectional studies and official recommendations. Methods The present study uses a longitudinal observational design with four waves of online data collection (from March 27 to June 15, 2020) in a convenience sample of the general population in Germany. A total of N = 2376 participants that completed at least two waves of the survey were included in the analyses. Findings Specific COVID‐19‐related anxiety and the average daily amount of preoccupation with the pandemic decreased continuously over the four waves. Unspecific worrying and depressive symptoms decreased on average but not on median level. Self‐efficacy, normalization, maintaining social contacts, and knowledge, where to get medical support, were associated with fewer symptoms relative to baseline. Suppression, unhealthy habits, and a longer average daily time of thinking about the pandemic were correlated with a relative increase of symptoms. Interpretation Our findings provide insight into the longitudinal changes of symptoms of psychological distress along the first three months of the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany. Furthermore, we were able to reaffirm the anticipated protective and risk factors that were extracted from previous studies and recommendations.