COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing

This article reports on the processing and comprehension of COMP-trace violations in German. The status of the COMP-trace effect in German is a controversial issue. It has been argued that judgments on long-distance (LD) subject questions are distorted because of parsing problems in the main clause...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankelien Schippers, Margreet Vogelzang, David Öwerdieck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Septentrio Academic Publishing 2020-10-01
Series:Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/5256
id doaj-dfa8d0625a2a4991b0ba47ba54944f17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfa8d0625a2a4991b0ba47ba54944f172020-11-25T02:26:16ZengSeptentrio Academic PublishingNordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics1503-85992020-10-0144110.7557/12.5256COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processingAnkelien Schippers0Margreet Vogelzang1David ÖwerdieckCarl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgUniversity of Cambridge This article reports on the processing and comprehension of COMP-trace violations in German. The status of the COMP-trace effect in German is a controversial issue. It has been argued that judgments on long-distance (LD) subject questions are distorted because of parsing problems in the main clause, the embedded clause, or both, and that LD subject questions are sometimes misinterpreted as object questions. Our self-paced reading data shows that processing difficulties with LD subject questions occur in the embedded clause, not the main clause, particularly at the point at which an embedded subject gap is postulated. Our study furthermore shows that readers are garden-pathed towards object readings of subject long-distance questions, but only when the embedded clause contains a case-ambiguous DP. A case-ambiguous DP thus functions as a superficial work-around for a COMP-trace violation. As we argue, our data support the view that German has a genuine COMP-trace effect and that potential parsing problems only occur in the context of local ambiguities. We propose that differences in the magnitude and fatality of COMP-trace violations between languages can be explained by formulating the COMP-trace effect in terms of accessibility, rather than a categorical syntactic constraint. https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/5256COMP-trace effectlong-distance movementself-paced readinggood-enough processinggarden-path effectscriterial freezing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ankelien Schippers
Margreet Vogelzang
David Öwerdieck
spellingShingle Ankelien Schippers
Margreet Vogelzang
David Öwerdieck
COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
COMP-trace effect
long-distance movement
self-paced reading
good-enough processing
garden-path effects
criterial freezing
author_facet Ankelien Schippers
Margreet Vogelzang
David Öwerdieck
author_sort Ankelien Schippers
title COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
title_short COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
title_full COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
title_fullStr COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
title_full_unstemmed COMP-trace effects in German: the role of processing
title_sort comp-trace effects in german: the role of processing
publisher Septentrio Academic Publishing
series Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics
issn 1503-8599
publishDate 2020-10-01
description This article reports on the processing and comprehension of COMP-trace violations in German. The status of the COMP-trace effect in German is a controversial issue. It has been argued that judgments on long-distance (LD) subject questions are distorted because of parsing problems in the main clause, the embedded clause, or both, and that LD subject questions are sometimes misinterpreted as object questions. Our self-paced reading data shows that processing difficulties with LD subject questions occur in the embedded clause, not the main clause, particularly at the point at which an embedded subject gap is postulated. Our study furthermore shows that readers are garden-pathed towards object readings of subject long-distance questions, but only when the embedded clause contains a case-ambiguous DP. A case-ambiguous DP thus functions as a superficial work-around for a COMP-trace violation. As we argue, our data support the view that German has a genuine COMP-trace effect and that potential parsing problems only occur in the context of local ambiguities. We propose that differences in the magnitude and fatality of COMP-trace violations between languages can be explained by formulating the COMP-trace effect in terms of accessibility, rather than a categorical syntactic constraint.
topic COMP-trace effect
long-distance movement
self-paced reading
good-enough processing
garden-path effects
criterial freezing
url https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/5256
work_keys_str_mv AT ankelienschippers comptraceeffectsingermantheroleofprocessing
AT margreetvogelzang comptraceeffectsingermantheroleofprocessing
AT davidowerdieck comptraceeffectsingermantheroleofprocessing
_version_ 1724848187136540672