Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?

Currently, the PV solar sector represents approx. 2% of worldwide annual electricity production (https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2018), and therefore, is just at the verge of becoming visible in most countries. As the PV sector becomes increasingly visible to the next order of magnitud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sauer Thomas C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:EPJ Photovoltaics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2019/01/pv190004/pv190004.html
id doaj-df814a03d94747599ab0694205d4f102
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df814a03d94747599ab0694205d4f1022021-04-02T15:34:08ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Photovoltaics2105-07162019-01-0110710.1051/epjpv/2019005pv190004Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?Sauer Thomas C.Currently, the PV solar sector represents approx. 2% of worldwide annual electricity production (https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2018), and therefore, is just at the verge of becoming visible in most countries. As the PV sector becomes increasingly visible to the next order of magnitude sometime in future, representing 20% in the electricity mix and beyond, it is now a good time to discuss reliability, predictability, and performance of PV power plants and as a consequence, the improvement potential for financial returns. Building on this train of thought, this article will provide a short introduction of PV power plant risks, predominantly related to technical performance. The question of risk mitigation measures will then be discussed: On the one side, quality assurance is a viable risk mitigation measure. However, even with quality assurance measures implemented, there are limitations when it comes to backstopping financial losses in the event that the performance deteriorates more than predicted and warranted by the manufacturers, or if the manufacturers or EPC's are no longer in business when incidental power degrades beyond calculated limits. Insurance solutions seem to provide an additional risk mitigation measure. Most insurance solutions on the market, however, only cover against externally induced risk exposures, e.g. severe weather, theft. Most of these insurance solutions follow a certain minimum standard. A few insurance products offer performance insurances where general cover is less standardized. All this triggers the question of how to look at insurance solutions. The interests of an insurance company are generally different than those of the insured stakeholders. These different viewpoints will be discussed, and selected warranty and insurance aspects will be considered. Recently, approximately 3500 insurance claim cases were statistically analyzed (http://www.pvstatlab.rwth-aachen.de/index.php/PVScan-project.html). Selected results of this analysis will be discussed. The article closes with an outlook of how insurers can likewise mitigate their risk exposure − in the end, insurers are only as good as the balance of the solvency resulting from their business model, or in the terminology of the insurance sector, the loss ratio must be at an acceptable level. This is where IECRE, the IEC System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for Use in Renewable Energy Applications (https://www.iecre.org/), offering an international standard for certification − and in future − a rating system for PV power plants on a system level comes into play.https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2019/01/pv190004/pv190004.htmlbankabilityclaim case reportconformity assessmentIECRE conformity assessment systeminsurance claim caseperformance warranty insurancePV power plant ratingrating systemrisk managementstandardization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sauer Thomas C.
spellingShingle Sauer Thomas C.
Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
EPJ Photovoltaics
bankability
claim case report
conformity assessment
IECRE conformity assessment system
insurance claim case
performance warranty insurance
PV power plant rating
rating system
risk management
standardization
author_facet Sauer Thomas C.
author_sort Sauer Thomas C.
title Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
title_short Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
title_full Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
title_fullStr Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
title_full_unstemmed Solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
title_sort solar investment risk mitigation − are we all on the same page?
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Photovoltaics
issn 2105-0716
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Currently, the PV solar sector represents approx. 2% of worldwide annual electricity production (https://webstore.iea.org/world-energy-outlook-2018), and therefore, is just at the verge of becoming visible in most countries. As the PV sector becomes increasingly visible to the next order of magnitude sometime in future, representing 20% in the electricity mix and beyond, it is now a good time to discuss reliability, predictability, and performance of PV power plants and as a consequence, the improvement potential for financial returns. Building on this train of thought, this article will provide a short introduction of PV power plant risks, predominantly related to technical performance. The question of risk mitigation measures will then be discussed: On the one side, quality assurance is a viable risk mitigation measure. However, even with quality assurance measures implemented, there are limitations when it comes to backstopping financial losses in the event that the performance deteriorates more than predicted and warranted by the manufacturers, or if the manufacturers or EPC's are no longer in business when incidental power degrades beyond calculated limits. Insurance solutions seem to provide an additional risk mitigation measure. Most insurance solutions on the market, however, only cover against externally induced risk exposures, e.g. severe weather, theft. Most of these insurance solutions follow a certain minimum standard. A few insurance products offer performance insurances where general cover is less standardized. All this triggers the question of how to look at insurance solutions. The interests of an insurance company are generally different than those of the insured stakeholders. These different viewpoints will be discussed, and selected warranty and insurance aspects will be considered. Recently, approximately 3500 insurance claim cases were statistically analyzed (http://www.pvstatlab.rwth-aachen.de/index.php/PVScan-project.html). Selected results of this analysis will be discussed. The article closes with an outlook of how insurers can likewise mitigate their risk exposure − in the end, insurers are only as good as the balance of the solvency resulting from their business model, or in the terminology of the insurance sector, the loss ratio must be at an acceptable level. This is where IECRE, the IEC System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for Use in Renewable Energy Applications (https://www.iecre.org/), offering an international standard for certification − and in future − a rating system for PV power plants on a system level comes into play.
topic bankability
claim case report
conformity assessment
IECRE conformity assessment system
insurance claim case
performance warranty insurance
PV power plant rating
rating system
risk management
standardization
url https://www.epj-pv.org/articles/epjpv/full_html/2019/01/pv190004/pv190004.html
work_keys_str_mv AT sauerthomasc solarinvestmentriskmitigationareweallonthesamepage
_version_ 1721559719970078720