Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East

In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governanc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alyson J.K. Bailes, Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Iceland 2009-12-01
Series:Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
Online Access:http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014
id doaj-df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe87128
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df6257825a4f4ac3b1666e63ffe871282020-11-24T21:25:44ZengUniversity of IcelandStjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla1670-68031670-679X2009-12-015222524810.13177/irpa.a.2009.5.2.2988Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-EastAlyson J.K. BailesJóhanna María ÞórdísardóttirIn 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations.http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
spellingShingle Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
author_facet Alyson J.K. Bailes
Jóhanna María Þórdísardóttir
author_sort Alyson J.K. Bailes
title Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_short Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_full Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_fullStr Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_full_unstemmed Iceland’s Neighbours in the EU Entry Queue: Contrasts or Parallels in EU Enlargement to the North and the South-East
title_sort iceland’s neighbours in the eu entry queue: contrasts or parallels in eu enlargement to the north and the south-east
publisher University of Iceland
series Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
issn 1670-6803
1670-679X
publishDate 2009-12-01
description In 2009, Iceland finds itself negotiating for EU entry alongside a group of 7 candidates and potential candidates from the Western Balkans. All are much poorer than Iceland and suffer from the legacies of regional conflict, ethnic division and under-development, plus specific weaknesses of governance, law and order. However, all the Balkan applicants have a clear majority of public opinion in favour of the EU and (except for Serbia) a cross-party consensus on accession. The severity of their problems makes EU and NATO membership their only hope and chance of a peaceful future, and also provides the main motive for the EU to grant their wish. Indeed the EU practises a policy of ‘conditionality’, using the lure of accession as leverage to make them improve their ways. Iceland does not have the same life-and-death importance for the EU unless, eventually, in the context of Arctic strategy. Several EU states have made clear they would not wish Iceland to ‘jump the queue’ past the other candidates. There may be lessons here for Iceland’s handling of its own negotiations.
url http://www.irpa.is/article/view/1014
work_keys_str_mv AT alysonjkbailes icelandsneighboursintheeuentryqueuecontrastsorparallelsineuenlargementtothenorthandthesoutheast
AT johannamariaþordisardottir icelandsneighboursintheeuentryqueuecontrastsorparallelsineuenlargementtothenorthandthesoutheast
_version_ 1725983239760248832