Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)

The rate of periprosthetic infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty ranges from 0,5 to 6%, while after the revision arthroplasty PJI rate grows up to 13,6%. Despite the fact that PJI is more often caused by gram-positive microorganisms, the treatment of patients induced by gram-nega...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. A. Bozhkova, P. P. Ivanov, E. A. Zemlyanskaya, N. N. Kornilov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 2019-12-01
Series:Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1351
id doaj-df54525ef902470f9b9c73668072f3ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df54525ef902470f9b9c73668072f3ca2021-07-29T08:01:20ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332019-12-0125413414010.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-134-140844Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)S. A. Bozhkova0P. P. Ivanov1E. A. Zemlyanskaya2N. N. Kornilov3Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical UniversityThe rate of periprosthetic infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty ranges from 0,5 to 6%, while after the revision arthroplasty PJI rate grows up to 13,6%. Despite the fact that PJI is more often caused by gram-positive microorganisms, the treatment of patients induced by gram-negative pathogens and fungi is the most complex and associated with the higher recurrence rate. This paper presents a positive two-stage treatment of a patient with fungal periprosthetic infection with a review of current medical literature. Revision, sanation of infection site and implantation of articulating antibacterial spacer was performed in the first stage of treatment. The second stage, which was the implantation of a revision prosthesis, followed in 6 months after removal of infection nidus. Subsequently the authors obtained good functional outcomes and stopping the infection process.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1351knee arthroplastyperiprosthetic infectionfungal periprosthetic infection
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. A. Bozhkova
P. P. Ivanov
E. A. Zemlyanskaya
N. N. Kornilov
spellingShingle S. A. Bozhkova
P. P. Ivanov
E. A. Zemlyanskaya
N. N. Kornilov
Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
knee arthroplasty
periprosthetic infection
fungal periprosthetic infection
author_facet S. A. Bozhkova
P. P. Ivanov
E. A. Zemlyanskaya
N. N. Kornilov
author_sort S. A. Bozhkova
title Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
title_short Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
title_full Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
title_fullStr Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
title_full_unstemmed Fungal Periprosthetic Infection after Total Knee Arthroplasty (Case Report and Review)
title_sort fungal periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty (case report and review)
publisher Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
series Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
issn 2311-2905
2542-0933
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The rate of periprosthetic infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty ranges from 0,5 to 6%, while after the revision arthroplasty PJI rate grows up to 13,6%. Despite the fact that PJI is more often caused by gram-positive microorganisms, the treatment of patients induced by gram-negative pathogens and fungi is the most complex and associated with the higher recurrence rate. This paper presents a positive two-stage treatment of a patient with fungal periprosthetic infection with a review of current medical literature. Revision, sanation of infection site and implantation of articulating antibacterial spacer was performed in the first stage of treatment. The second stage, which was the implantation of a revision prosthesis, followed in 6 months after removal of infection nidus. Subsequently the authors obtained good functional outcomes and stopping the infection process.
topic knee arthroplasty
periprosthetic infection
fungal periprosthetic infection
url https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1351
work_keys_str_mv AT sabozhkova fungalperiprostheticinfectionaftertotalkneearthroplastycasereportandreview
AT ppivanov fungalperiprostheticinfectionaftertotalkneearthroplastycasereportandreview
AT eazemlyanskaya fungalperiprostheticinfectionaftertotalkneearthroplastycasereportandreview
AT nnkornilov fungalperiprostheticinfectionaftertotalkneearthroplastycasereportandreview
_version_ 1721258886411845632