Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
Studies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the stud...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-df5311d1321e4c9bac249083dce6c1f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-df5311d1321e4c9bac249083dce6c1f32020-11-25T02:50:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8144610.1371/journal.pone.0081446Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.Pingyuan GongGuomin ShenShe LiGuoping ZhangHongchao FangLin LeiPeizhe ZhangFuchang ZhangStudies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the study, 650 college students were genotyped with regard to COMT Val158Met and DRD2 TaqI A polymorphisms, and the attentional bias for facial expressions was assessed using the spatial cueing task. The results indicated that COMT Val158Met underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for negative emotional expressions (P = 0.03) and the Met carriers showed more engagement bias for negative expressions than the Val/Val homozygote. On the contrary, DRD2 TaqIA underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for positive expressions (P = 0.003) and individuals with TT genotype showed much more engagement bias for positive expressions than the individuals with CC genotype. Moreover, the two genes exerted significant interactions on the engagements for negative and positive expressions (P = 0.046, P = 0.005). These findings suggest that the individual differences in the attentional bias for emotional expressions are partially underpinned by the genetic polymorphisms in COMT and DRD2.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pingyuan Gong Guomin Shen She Li Guoping Zhang Hongchao Fang Lin Lei Peizhe Zhang Fuchang Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Pingyuan Gong Guomin Shen She Li Guoping Zhang Hongchao Fang Lin Lei Peizhe Zhang Fuchang Zhang Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Pingyuan Gong Guomin Shen She Li Guoping Zhang Hongchao Fang Lin Lei Peizhe Zhang Fuchang Zhang |
author_sort |
Pingyuan Gong |
title |
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
title_short |
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
title_full |
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
title_fullStr |
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
title_sort |
genetic variations in comt and drd2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Studies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the study, 650 college students were genotyped with regard to COMT Val158Met and DRD2 TaqI A polymorphisms, and the attentional bias for facial expressions was assessed using the spatial cueing task. The results indicated that COMT Val158Met underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for negative emotional expressions (P = 0.03) and the Met carriers showed more engagement bias for negative expressions than the Val/Val homozygote. On the contrary, DRD2 TaqIA underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for positive expressions (P = 0.003) and individuals with TT genotype showed much more engagement bias for positive expressions than the individuals with CC genotype. Moreover, the two genes exerted significant interactions on the engagements for negative and positive expressions (P = 0.046, P = 0.005). These findings suggest that the individual differences in the attentional bias for emotional expressions are partially underpinned by the genetic polymorphisms in COMT and DRD2. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pingyuangong geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT guominshen geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT sheli geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT guopingzhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT hongchaofang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT linlei geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT peizhezhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions AT fuchangzhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions |
_version_ |
1724736687890759680 |