Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.

Studies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pingyuan Gong, Guomin Shen, She Li, Guoping Zhang, Hongchao Fang, Lin Lei, Peizhe Zhang, Fuchang Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render
id doaj-df5311d1321e4c9bac249083dce6c1f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df5311d1321e4c9bac249083dce6c1f32020-11-25T02:50:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8144610.1371/journal.pone.0081446Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.Pingyuan GongGuomin ShenShe LiGuoping ZhangHongchao FangLin LeiPeizhe ZhangFuchang ZhangStudies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the study, 650 college students were genotyped with regard to COMT Val158Met and DRD2 TaqI A polymorphisms, and the attentional bias for facial expressions was assessed using the spatial cueing task. The results indicated that COMT Val158Met underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for negative emotional expressions (P = 0.03) and the Met carriers showed more engagement bias for negative expressions than the Val/Val homozygote. On the contrary, DRD2 TaqIA underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for positive expressions (P = 0.003) and individuals with TT genotype showed much more engagement bias for positive expressions than the individuals with CC genotype. Moreover, the two genes exerted significant interactions on the engagements for negative and positive expressions (P = 0.046, P = 0.005). These findings suggest that the individual differences in the attentional bias for emotional expressions are partially underpinned by the genetic polymorphisms in COMT and DRD2.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pingyuan Gong
Guomin Shen
She Li
Guoping Zhang
Hongchao Fang
Lin Lei
Peizhe Zhang
Fuchang Zhang
spellingShingle Pingyuan Gong
Guomin Shen
She Li
Guoping Zhang
Hongchao Fang
Lin Lei
Peizhe Zhang
Fuchang Zhang
Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Pingyuan Gong
Guomin Shen
She Li
Guoping Zhang
Hongchao Fang
Lin Lei
Peizhe Zhang
Fuchang Zhang
author_sort Pingyuan Gong
title Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
title_short Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
title_full Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
title_fullStr Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variations in COMT and DRD2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
title_sort genetic variations in comt and drd2 modulate attentional bias for affective facial expressions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Studies have revealed that catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and dopaminegic receptor2 (DRD2) modulate human attention bias for palatable food or tobacco. However, the existing evidence about the modulations of COMT and DRD2 on attentional bias for facial expressions was still limited. In the study, 650 college students were genotyped with regard to COMT Val158Met and DRD2 TaqI A polymorphisms, and the attentional bias for facial expressions was assessed using the spatial cueing task. The results indicated that COMT Val158Met underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for negative emotional expressions (P = 0.03) and the Met carriers showed more engagement bias for negative expressions than the Val/Val homozygote. On the contrary, DRD2 TaqIA underpinned the individual difference in attentional bias for positive expressions (P = 0.003) and individuals with TT genotype showed much more engagement bias for positive expressions than the individuals with CC genotype. Moreover, the two genes exerted significant interactions on the engagements for negative and positive expressions (P = 0.046, P = 0.005). These findings suggest that the individual differences in the attentional bias for emotional expressions are partially underpinned by the genetic polymorphisms in COMT and DRD2.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3846795?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT pingyuangong geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT guominshen geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT sheli geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT guopingzhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT hongchaofang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT linlei geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT peizhezhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
AT fuchangzhang geneticvariationsincomtanddrd2modulateattentionalbiasforaffectivefacialexpressions
_version_ 1724736687890759680