Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)

Excerpt: In Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data, Wehlburg persuasively argues that letting evidence guide change and innovation is perhaps the only way to break the dysfunctional tradition of what may be termed “teaching as telling” and “grading to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gail Rathbun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georgia Southern University 2008-07-01
Series:International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/27
id doaj-df3cd10294574ccab52b245c6837e223
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df3cd10294574ccab52b245c6837e2232020-11-24T21:41:07ZengGeorgia Southern UniversityInternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1931-47442008-07-012210.20429/ijsotl.2008.020227Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)Gail RathbunExcerpt: In Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data, Wehlburg persuasively argues that letting evidence guide change and innovation is perhaps the only way to break the dysfunctional tradition of what may be termed “teaching as telling” and “grading to the bell curve.” Throughout the book, Wehlburg convincingly argues that assessment is not yet another chore that faculty and administrators are obliged to perform, but an integrated set of activities that enhances learning and provides the feedback teachers and institutions need in order to improve learning outcomes and implement innovations in teaching. In Chapter 1, “Data-based Decision-Making,” Wehlburg effectively makes the case for data-driven course redesign. Better yet, in Chapter 2, Wehlburg asserts that many faculty members are already engaged in performing assessments, they are just not aware of how to make use of the data to revise their courses.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/27Catherine WehlburgCourse revision
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gail Rathbun
spellingShingle Gail Rathbun
Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Catherine Wehlburg
Course revision
author_facet Gail Rathbun
author_sort Gail Rathbun
title Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
title_short Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
title_full Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
title_fullStr Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
title_full_unstemmed Book Review: Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data by Catherine Wehlburg (Jossey-Bass, 2007)
title_sort book review: meaningful course revision: enhancing academic engagement using student learning data by catherine wehlburg (jossey-bass, 2007)
publisher Georgia Southern University
series International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1931-4744
publishDate 2008-07-01
description Excerpt: In Meaningful Course Revision: Enhancing Academic Engagement Using Student Learning Data, Wehlburg persuasively argues that letting evidence guide change and innovation is perhaps the only way to break the dysfunctional tradition of what may be termed “teaching as telling” and “grading to the bell curve.” Throughout the book, Wehlburg convincingly argues that assessment is not yet another chore that faculty and administrators are obliged to perform, but an integrated set of activities that enhances learning and provides the feedback teachers and institutions need in order to improve learning outcomes and implement innovations in teaching. In Chapter 1, “Data-based Decision-Making,” Wehlburg effectively makes the case for data-driven course redesign. Better yet, in Chapter 2, Wehlburg asserts that many faculty members are already engaged in performing assessments, they are just not aware of how to make use of the data to revise their courses.
topic Catherine Wehlburg
Course revision
url https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol2/iss2/27
work_keys_str_mv AT gailrathbun bookreviewmeaningfulcourserevisionenhancingacademicengagementusingstudentlearningdatabycatherinewehlburgjosseybass2007
_version_ 1725922968679219200