Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin

Mammals contain over 200 different cell types, yet nearly all have the same genomic DNA sequence. It is a key question in biology how the genetic instructions in DNA are selectively interpreted by cells to specify various transcriptional programs and therefore cellular identity. The structural and f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henning Ummethum, Stephan Hamperl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00450/full
id doaj-df2f24b0fa61459f81f0aec11443a416
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df2f24b0fa61459f81f0aec11443a4162020-11-25T03:02:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212020-05-011110.3389/fgene.2020.00450536839Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study ChromatinHenning UmmethumStephan HamperlMammals contain over 200 different cell types, yet nearly all have the same genomic DNA sequence. It is a key question in biology how the genetic instructions in DNA are selectively interpreted by cells to specify various transcriptional programs and therefore cellular identity. The structural and functional organization of chromatin governs the transcriptional state of individual genes. To understand how genomic loci adopt different levels of gene expression, it is critical to characterize all local chromatin factors as well as long-range interactions in the 3D nuclear compartment. Much of our current knowledge regarding protein interactions in a chromatin context is based on affinity purification of chromatin components coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS). AP-MS has been invaluable to map strong protein-protein interactions in the nucleus. However, the interaction is detected after cell lysis and biochemical enrichment, allowing for loss or gain of false positive or negative interaction partners. Recently, proximity-dependent labeling methods have emerged as powerful tools for studying chromatin in its native context. These methods take advantage of engineered enzymes that are fused to a chromatin factor of interest and can directly label all factors in proximity. Subsequent pull-down assays followed by mass spectrometry or sequencing approaches provide a comprehensive snapshot of the proximal chromatin interactome. By combining this method with dCas9, this approach can also be extended to study chromatin at specific genomic loci. Here, we review and compare current proximity-labeling approaches available for studying chromatin, with a particular focus on new emerging technologies that can provide important insights into the transcriptional and chromatin interaction networks essential for cellular identity.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00450/fullprotein-protein interactionsproxisomeBioIDAPEX2dCas9ChIP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henning Ummethum
Stephan Hamperl
spellingShingle Henning Ummethum
Stephan Hamperl
Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
Frontiers in Genetics
protein-protein interactions
proxisome
BioID
APEX2
dCas9
ChIP
author_facet Henning Ummethum
Stephan Hamperl
author_sort Henning Ummethum
title Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
title_short Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
title_full Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
title_fullStr Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
title_full_unstemmed Proximity Labeling Techniques to Study Chromatin
title_sort proximity labeling techniques to study chromatin
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Genetics
issn 1664-8021
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Mammals contain over 200 different cell types, yet nearly all have the same genomic DNA sequence. It is a key question in biology how the genetic instructions in DNA are selectively interpreted by cells to specify various transcriptional programs and therefore cellular identity. The structural and functional organization of chromatin governs the transcriptional state of individual genes. To understand how genomic loci adopt different levels of gene expression, it is critical to characterize all local chromatin factors as well as long-range interactions in the 3D nuclear compartment. Much of our current knowledge regarding protein interactions in a chromatin context is based on affinity purification of chromatin components coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS). AP-MS has been invaluable to map strong protein-protein interactions in the nucleus. However, the interaction is detected after cell lysis and biochemical enrichment, allowing for loss or gain of false positive or negative interaction partners. Recently, proximity-dependent labeling methods have emerged as powerful tools for studying chromatin in its native context. These methods take advantage of engineered enzymes that are fused to a chromatin factor of interest and can directly label all factors in proximity. Subsequent pull-down assays followed by mass spectrometry or sequencing approaches provide a comprehensive snapshot of the proximal chromatin interactome. By combining this method with dCas9, this approach can also be extended to study chromatin at specific genomic loci. Here, we review and compare current proximity-labeling approaches available for studying chromatin, with a particular focus on new emerging technologies that can provide important insights into the transcriptional and chromatin interaction networks essential for cellular identity.
topic protein-protein interactions
proxisome
BioID
APEX2
dCas9
ChIP
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00450/full
work_keys_str_mv AT henningummethum proximitylabelingtechniquestostudychromatin
AT stephanhamperl proximitylabelingtechniquestostudychromatin
_version_ 1724688360817033216