Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of several recently developed assays for the detection of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) in a large, multinational field trial.Samples from 1,128 M/XDR-TB suspects were examined by Line Probe Assay (LPA), Pyrosequenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonino Catanzaro, Timothy C Rodwell, Donald G Catanzaro, Richard S Garfein, Roberta L Jackson, Marva Seifert, Sophia B Georghiou, Andre Trollip, Erik Groessl, Naomi Hillery, Valeriu Crudu, Thomas C Victor, Camilla Rodrigues, Grace Shou-Yean Lin, Faramarz Valafar, Edward Desmond, Kathleen Eisenach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556461?pdf=render
id doaj-df2d5307077e439796b84e5699c652b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df2d5307077e439796b84e5699c652b52020-11-25T00:48:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013686110.1371/journal.pone.0136861Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Antonino CatanzaroTimothy C RodwellDonald G CatanzaroRichard S GarfeinRoberta L JacksonMarva SeifertSophia B GeorghiouAndre TrollipErik GroesslNaomi HilleryValeriu CruduThomas C VictorCamilla RodriguesGrace Shou-Yean LinFaramarz ValafarEdward DesmondKathleen EisenachThe aim of this study was to compare the performance of several recently developed assays for the detection of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) in a large, multinational field trial.Samples from 1,128 M/XDR-TB suspects were examined by Line Probe Assay (LPA), Pyrosequencing (PSQ), and Microscopic Observation of Drug Susceptibility (MODS) and compared to the BACTEC MGIT960 reference standard to detect M/XDR-TB directly from patient sputum samples collected at TB clinics in India, Moldova, and South Africa.Specificity for all three assays was excellent: 97-100% for isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), moxifloxacin (MOX) and ofloxacin (OFX) and 99-100% for amikacin (AMK), capreomycin (CAP) and kanamycin (KAN) resistance. Sensitivities were lower, but still very good: 94-100% for INH, RIF, MOX and OFX, and 84-90% for AMK and CAP, but only 48-62% for KAN. In terms of agreement, statistically significant differences were only found for detection of RIF (MODS outperformed PSQ) and KAN (MODS outperformed LPA and PSQ) resistance. Mean time-to-result was 1.1 days for LPA and PSQ, 14.3 days for MODS, and 24.7 days for MGIT.All three rapid assays evaluated provide clinicians with timely detection of resistance to the drugs tested; with molecular results available one day following laboratory receipt of samples. In particular, the very high specificity seen for detection of drug resistance means that clinicians can use the results of these rapid tests to avoid the use of toxic drugs to which the infecting organism is resistant and develop treatment regiments that have a higher likelihood of yielding a successful outcome.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556461?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonino Catanzaro
Timothy C Rodwell
Donald G Catanzaro
Richard S Garfein
Roberta L Jackson
Marva Seifert
Sophia B Georghiou
Andre Trollip
Erik Groessl
Naomi Hillery
Valeriu Crudu
Thomas C Victor
Camilla Rodrigues
Grace Shou-Yean Lin
Faramarz Valafar
Edward Desmond
Kathleen Eisenach
spellingShingle Antonino Catanzaro
Timothy C Rodwell
Donald G Catanzaro
Richard S Garfein
Roberta L Jackson
Marva Seifert
Sophia B Georghiou
Andre Trollip
Erik Groessl
Naomi Hillery
Valeriu Crudu
Thomas C Victor
Camilla Rodrigues
Grace Shou-Yean Lin
Faramarz Valafar
Edward Desmond
Kathleen Eisenach
Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Antonino Catanzaro
Timothy C Rodwell
Donald G Catanzaro
Richard S Garfein
Roberta L Jackson
Marva Seifert
Sophia B Georghiou
Andre Trollip
Erik Groessl
Naomi Hillery
Valeriu Crudu
Thomas C Victor
Camilla Rodrigues
Grace Shou-Yean Lin
Faramarz Valafar
Edward Desmond
Kathleen Eisenach
author_sort Antonino Catanzaro
title Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
title_short Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
title_full Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Three Rapid Tests for the Diagnosis of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
title_sort performance comparison of three rapid tests for the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The aim of this study was to compare the performance of several recently developed assays for the detection of multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR-TB) in a large, multinational field trial.Samples from 1,128 M/XDR-TB suspects were examined by Line Probe Assay (LPA), Pyrosequencing (PSQ), and Microscopic Observation of Drug Susceptibility (MODS) and compared to the BACTEC MGIT960 reference standard to detect M/XDR-TB directly from patient sputum samples collected at TB clinics in India, Moldova, and South Africa.Specificity for all three assays was excellent: 97-100% for isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), moxifloxacin (MOX) and ofloxacin (OFX) and 99-100% for amikacin (AMK), capreomycin (CAP) and kanamycin (KAN) resistance. Sensitivities were lower, but still very good: 94-100% for INH, RIF, MOX and OFX, and 84-90% for AMK and CAP, but only 48-62% for KAN. In terms of agreement, statistically significant differences were only found for detection of RIF (MODS outperformed PSQ) and KAN (MODS outperformed LPA and PSQ) resistance. Mean time-to-result was 1.1 days for LPA and PSQ, 14.3 days for MODS, and 24.7 days for MGIT.All three rapid assays evaluated provide clinicians with timely detection of resistance to the drugs tested; with molecular results available one day following laboratory receipt of samples. In particular, the very high specificity seen for detection of drug resistance means that clinicians can use the results of these rapid tests to avoid the use of toxic drugs to which the infecting organism is resistant and develop treatment regiments that have a higher likelihood of yielding a successful outcome.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4556461?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT antoninocatanzaro performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT timothycrodwell performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT donaldgcatanzaro performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT richardsgarfein performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT robertaljackson performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT marvaseifert performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT sophiabgeorghiou performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT andretrollip performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT erikgroessl performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT naomihillery performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT valeriucrudu performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT thomascvictor performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT camillarodrigues performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT graceshouyeanlin performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT faramarzvalafar performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT edwarddesmond performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
AT kathleeneisenach performancecomparisonofthreerapidtestsforthediagnosisofdrugresistanttuberculosis
_version_ 1725257349588844544