Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians

Background: There is a growing body of literature showing that gender discrimination impacts physicians' work and life experiences. Impact on income, promotion, and parenthood has been documented. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the experiences of academic physicians who identify...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mary Ann Liebert 2020-07-01
Series:Women's Health Reports
Online Access:https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2020.0031
id doaj-df27571cb3ad4b1e8badb37f42182570
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df27571cb3ad4b1e8badb37f421825702020-12-03T03:02:04ZengMary Ann LiebertWomen's Health Reports2688-48442020-07-0110.1089/WHR.2020.0031Gender Discrimination Among Academic PhysiciansBackground: There is a growing body of literature showing that gender discrimination impacts physicians' work and life experiences. Impact on income, promotion, and parenthood has been documented. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the experiences of academic physicians who identify as women or gender nonconforming would be different from their counterparts who are men. This survey study explores the influences of gender on academic physicians' experiences with discrimination in life and at work. Materials and Methods: In the spring of 2017, academic physicians (n?=?752) at a medical school in the West were invited to participate in a survey that measured experiences with discrimination using the Everyday Discrimination Scale and additional items. We used a mixed-methods approach to analyze the data, employing chi square and t-tests to analyze quantitative data and modified content analysis to code open-ended responses. Results: The response rate was 24% (180/752). There was no significant difference between women and men in reported frequency of discrimination in everyday life (p?=?0.474). However, women were significantly more likely than men to select gender as a reason for being treated differently in everyday life (p?=?0.000) and report discrimination in the workplace (p?<?0.000). Open-ended responses describing experiences of discrimination differed based on gender: women were twice as likely than men to report receiving negative treatment owing to gender. Finally, men discussed having gender privilege, whereas women discussed experiencing gender discrimination. Conclusions: This study contributes to the growing body of literature about how gender influences the experience of practicing medicine.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2020.0031
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
spellingShingle Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
Women's Health Reports
title_short Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
title_full Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
title_fullStr Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
title_full_unstemmed Gender Discrimination Among Academic Physicians
title_sort gender discrimination among academic physicians
publisher Mary Ann Liebert
series Women's Health Reports
issn 2688-4844
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Background: There is a growing body of literature showing that gender discrimination impacts physicians' work and life experiences. Impact on income, promotion, and parenthood has been documented. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the experiences of academic physicians who identify as women or gender nonconforming would be different from their counterparts who are men. This survey study explores the influences of gender on academic physicians' experiences with discrimination in life and at work. Materials and Methods: In the spring of 2017, academic physicians (n?=?752) at a medical school in the West were invited to participate in a survey that measured experiences with discrimination using the Everyday Discrimination Scale and additional items. We used a mixed-methods approach to analyze the data, employing chi square and t-tests to analyze quantitative data and modified content analysis to code open-ended responses. Results: The response rate was 24% (180/752). There was no significant difference between women and men in reported frequency of discrimination in everyday life (p?=?0.474). However, women were significantly more likely than men to select gender as a reason for being treated differently in everyday life (p?=?0.000) and report discrimination in the workplace (p?<?0.000). Open-ended responses describing experiences of discrimination differed based on gender: women were twice as likely than men to report receiving negative treatment owing to gender. Finally, men discussed having gender privilege, whereas women discussed experiencing gender discrimination. Conclusions: This study contributes to the growing body of literature about how gender influences the experience of practicing medicine.
url https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2020.0031
_version_ 1724401676018778112