Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification

Abstract Nonlinear diffusion–reaction problem was investigated experimentally for the reference reaction (hydrogenation of propylene under isothermal conditions; a slab of catalyst pellet i.e., disks of large diameter/width ratio were applied). The diffusion–reaction model in the catalyst pellet wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirosław K. Szukiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020-06-01
Series:SN Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3045-0
id doaj-df2737d17e954eb9a77fc28d214f4bf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df2737d17e954eb9a77fc28d214f4bf92021-06-20T11:19:55ZengSpringerSN Applied Sciences2523-39632523-39712020-06-012711410.1007/s42452-020-3045-0Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verificationMirosław K. Szukiewicz0Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Rzeszów University of TechnologyAbstract Nonlinear diffusion–reaction problem was investigated experimentally for the reference reaction (hydrogenation of propylene under isothermal conditions; a slab of catalyst pellet i.e., disks of large diameter/width ratio were applied). The diffusion–reaction model in the catalyst pellet with external mass-transfer resistances was solved analytically. Dependently on parameters values, two separate solutions were found: dead zone inside the pellet does not exist or it appears. In the first case, a common model is acceptable (regular model i.e., boundary value problem), in the second one, a model includes additional condition (dead zone model i.e., free boundary problem). Analysis of the solution presented indicated that either regular or “dead zone” model correctly describes the process for specific parameter values (with the only exception—multiple steady-state region—where the correct interpretation requires the combined application of the both). This result shows that the full description of the real process includes solutions of two different BVPs. Experimental research confirmed results anticipated by theory. It allowed to draw conclusions that go beyond this particular example i.e., the regular model, commonly applied in heterogeneous catalysis, does not adequately recognize dead zone problem. If “dead zone” appears, free boundary problem has to be consider, otherwise, process simulations will be incorrect. The conclusions drawn are valid also for biofilms.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3045-0Reaction–diffusion problemDead zoneFree boundary problemAnalytical solutionHydrogenation reaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mirosław K. Szukiewicz
spellingShingle Mirosław K. Szukiewicz
Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
SN Applied Sciences
Reaction–diffusion problem
Dead zone
Free boundary problem
Analytical solution
Hydrogenation reaction
author_facet Mirosław K. Szukiewicz
author_sort Mirosław K. Szukiewicz
title Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
title_short Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
title_full Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
title_fullStr Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
title_full_unstemmed Study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
title_sort study of reaction–diffusion problem: modeling, exact analytical solution, and experimental verification
publisher Springer
series SN Applied Sciences
issn 2523-3963
2523-3971
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Nonlinear diffusion–reaction problem was investigated experimentally for the reference reaction (hydrogenation of propylene under isothermal conditions; a slab of catalyst pellet i.e., disks of large diameter/width ratio were applied). The diffusion–reaction model in the catalyst pellet with external mass-transfer resistances was solved analytically. Dependently on parameters values, two separate solutions were found: dead zone inside the pellet does not exist or it appears. In the first case, a common model is acceptable (regular model i.e., boundary value problem), in the second one, a model includes additional condition (dead zone model i.e., free boundary problem). Analysis of the solution presented indicated that either regular or “dead zone” model correctly describes the process for specific parameter values (with the only exception—multiple steady-state region—where the correct interpretation requires the combined application of the both). This result shows that the full description of the real process includes solutions of two different BVPs. Experimental research confirmed results anticipated by theory. It allowed to draw conclusions that go beyond this particular example i.e., the regular model, commonly applied in heterogeneous catalysis, does not adequately recognize dead zone problem. If “dead zone” appears, free boundary problem has to be consider, otherwise, process simulations will be incorrect. The conclusions drawn are valid also for biofilms.
topic Reaction–diffusion problem
Dead zone
Free boundary problem
Analytical solution
Hydrogenation reaction
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3045-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mirosławkszukiewicz studyofreactiondiffusionproblemmodelingexactanalyticalsolutionandexperimentalverification
_version_ 1721370158744731648