Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory

The aim of this review article is to reveal the cons and pros of ethical relativism, especially conventionalism. This article is written with the intention of showing some of the practical upshots of conventionalism without totally denying some of its virtues in a world where diversity of cultures a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yohannes Eshetu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Online Access:https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/121
id doaj-df0193bb14b74549abee155895351c88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-df0193bb14b74549abee155895351c882020-11-24T23:33:03ZengInternational journal of multicultural and multireligious understandingInternational Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding2364-53692364-53692017-12-0146243010.18415/ijmmu.v4i6.12183Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the TheoryYohannes Eshetu0Department of Governance and Development Studies, Jimma University, EthiopiaThe aim of this review article is to reveal the cons and pros of ethical relativism, especially conventionalism. This article is written with the intention of showing some of the practical upshots of conventionalism without totally denying some of its virtues in a world where diversity of cultures and customs is apparent. The article inquires the question: Is ethical relativism tenable? The review article relies on reviewing secondary sources. What I am arguing in this article is that despite the attraction of ethical relativism as an intellectual weapon to fight against ethnocentrism and cultural intolerance, the view still goes against the idea of intercultural comparison, criticism and moral argumentation, so that it would have serious disastrous implication on practice, especially on the universal character of human rights and shutters all together any sort of moral progress and reform. The article concludes that we can set forth certain objective moral codes, discovered through rational intercultural dialogue and discussion which could be applied regardless of cultural specificities upon which cultural inter-comparison, discussion and moral argumentation is possible.https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/121
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yohannes Eshetu
spellingShingle Yohannes Eshetu
Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
author_facet Yohannes Eshetu
author_sort Yohannes Eshetu
title Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
title_short Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
title_full Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
title_fullStr Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Cultural Relativism: A critical Appraisal of the Theory
title_sort understanding cultural relativism: a critical appraisal of the theory
publisher International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding
series International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
issn 2364-5369
2364-5369
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The aim of this review article is to reveal the cons and pros of ethical relativism, especially conventionalism. This article is written with the intention of showing some of the practical upshots of conventionalism without totally denying some of its virtues in a world where diversity of cultures and customs is apparent. The article inquires the question: Is ethical relativism tenable? The review article relies on reviewing secondary sources. What I am arguing in this article is that despite the attraction of ethical relativism as an intellectual weapon to fight against ethnocentrism and cultural intolerance, the view still goes against the idea of intercultural comparison, criticism and moral argumentation, so that it would have serious disastrous implication on practice, especially on the universal character of human rights and shutters all together any sort of moral progress and reform. The article concludes that we can set forth certain objective moral codes, discovered through rational intercultural dialogue and discussion which could be applied regardless of cultural specificities upon which cultural inter-comparison, discussion and moral argumentation is possible.
url https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/121
work_keys_str_mv AT yohanneseshetu understandingculturalrelativismacriticalappraisalofthetheory
_version_ 1725532249649053696