Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train

Multimodal primary forest fuel (PFF) transport using the railroad for main haulage has been quite uncommon to present, although it could provide considerable advantages in terms of economical, ecological and social parameters. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to assess barriers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolfsmayr, Ulrich, Rauch, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2014-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1217
id doaj-dee5cb3aa9a74c73935d811f3a526efd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dee5cb3aa9a74c73935d811f3a526efd2020-11-25T02:33:25ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752014-01-0148510.14214/sf.1217Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to trainWolfsmayr, UlrichRauch, Peter Multimodal primary forest fuel (PFF) transport using the railroad for main haulage has been quite uncommon to present, although it could provide considerable advantages in terms of economical, ecological and social parameters. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to assess barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train. As methodological tool, we are using the concept of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) with the House of Quality (HoQ) â an approach that has not been used in forest management so far. As the most important barriers for the modal shift from truck to train in PFF transport in Austria, the following were identified: (i) bioenergy plant managers have a negative opinion and negative experience regarding the railroad in terms of high prices, a lot of bureaucracy, etc.; (ii) absence of rail sidings or relatively short rail sidings not suitable for block trains; and (iii) unwillingness to invest in new supply or unloading systems. On the contrary, the most important drivers for a modal shift are: (i) multimodal PFF supply chains using trains can provide high volumes; (ii) increasing catchment areas for larger CHP plants result in increasing transport distances; and (iii) rail transport has less negative environmental and social impact than road transport.https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1217
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolfsmayr, Ulrich
Rauch, Peter
spellingShingle Wolfsmayr, Ulrich
Rauch, Peter
Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
Silva Fennica
author_facet Wolfsmayr, Ulrich
Rauch, Peter
author_sort Wolfsmayr, Ulrich
title Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
title_short Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
title_full Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
title_fullStr Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
title_full_unstemmed Primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
title_sort primary forest fuel supply chain: assessing barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Multimodal primary forest fuel (PFF) transport using the railroad for main haulage has been quite uncommon to present, although it could provide considerable advantages in terms of economical, ecological and social parameters. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to assess barriers and drivers for the modal shift from truck to train. As methodological tool, we are using the concept of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) with the House of Quality (HoQ) â an approach that has not been used in forest management so far. As the most important barriers for the modal shift from truck to train in PFF transport in Austria, the following were identified: (i) bioenergy plant managers have a negative opinion and negative experience regarding the railroad in terms of high prices, a lot of bureaucracy, etc.; (ii) absence of rail sidings or relatively short rail sidings not suitable for block trains; and (iii) unwillingness to invest in new supply or unloading systems. On the contrary, the most important drivers for a modal shift are: (i) multimodal PFF supply chains using trains can provide high volumes; (ii) increasing catchment areas for larger CHP plants result in increasing transport distances; and (iii) rail transport has less negative environmental and social impact than road transport.
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1217
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfsmayrulrich primaryforestfuelsupplychainassessingbarriersanddriversforthemodalshiftfromtrucktotrain
AT rauchpeter primaryforestfuelsupplychainassessingbarriersanddriversforthemodalshiftfromtrucktotrain
_version_ 1724814152122236928