Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks
Animals, including humans, consistently exhibit myopia in two different contexts: foraging, in which they harvest locally beyond what is predicted by optimal foraging theory, and intertemporal choice, in which they exhibit a preference for immediate vs. delayed rewards beyond what is predicted by ra...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2019-09-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/48429 |
id |
doaj-dee3d2aed1234d7e89c8dd6d1324270c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dee3d2aed1234d7e89c8dd6d1324270c2021-05-05T17:56:03ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2019-09-01810.7554/eLife.48429Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasksGary A Kane0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-5055Aaron M Bornstein1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-6000Amitai Shenhav2Robert C Wilson3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2963-2971Nathaniel D Daw4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-1430Jonathan D Cohen5Department of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States; Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard University, Cambridge, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States; Department of Cognitive Sciences, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United StatesDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United StatesAnimals, including humans, consistently exhibit myopia in two different contexts: foraging, in which they harvest locally beyond what is predicted by optimal foraging theory, and intertemporal choice, in which they exhibit a preference for immediate vs. delayed rewards beyond what is predicted by rational (exponential) discounting. Despite the similarity in behavior between these two contexts, previous efforts to reconcile these observations in terms of a consistent pattern of time preferences have failed. Here, via extensive behavioral testing and quantitative modeling, we show that rats exhibit similar time preferences in both contexts: they prefer immediate vs. delayed rewards and they are sensitive to opportunity costs of delays to future decisions. Further, a quasi-hyperbolic discounting model, a form of hyperbolic discounting with separate components for short- and long-term rewards, explains individual rats’ time preferences across both contexts, providing evidence for a common mechanism for myopic behavior in foraging and intertemporal choice.https://elifesciences.org/articles/48429foragingintertemporal choicetemporal discounting |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gary A Kane Aaron M Bornstein Amitai Shenhav Robert C Wilson Nathaniel D Daw Jonathan D Cohen |
spellingShingle |
Gary A Kane Aaron M Bornstein Amitai Shenhav Robert C Wilson Nathaniel D Daw Jonathan D Cohen Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks eLife foraging intertemporal choice temporal discounting |
author_facet |
Gary A Kane Aaron M Bornstein Amitai Shenhav Robert C Wilson Nathaniel D Daw Jonathan D Cohen |
author_sort |
Gary A Kane |
title |
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
title_short |
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
title_full |
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
title_fullStr |
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
title_sort |
rats exhibit similar biases in foraging and intertemporal choice tasks |
publisher |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd |
series |
eLife |
issn |
2050-084X |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Animals, including humans, consistently exhibit myopia in two different contexts: foraging, in which they harvest locally beyond what is predicted by optimal foraging theory, and intertemporal choice, in which they exhibit a preference for immediate vs. delayed rewards beyond what is predicted by rational (exponential) discounting. Despite the similarity in behavior between these two contexts, previous efforts to reconcile these observations in terms of a consistent pattern of time preferences have failed. Here, via extensive behavioral testing and quantitative modeling, we show that rats exhibit similar time preferences in both contexts: they prefer immediate vs. delayed rewards and they are sensitive to opportunity costs of delays to future decisions. Further, a quasi-hyperbolic discounting model, a form of hyperbolic discounting with separate components for short- and long-term rewards, explains individual rats’ time preferences across both contexts, providing evidence for a common mechanism for myopic behavior in foraging and intertemporal choice. |
topic |
foraging intertemporal choice temporal discounting |
url |
https://elifesciences.org/articles/48429 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT garyakane ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks AT aaronmbornstein ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks AT amitaishenhav ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks AT robertcwilson ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks AT nathanielddaw ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks AT jonathandcohen ratsexhibitsimilarbiasesinforagingandintertemporalchoicetasks |
_version_ |
1721458914276409344 |