Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia

Abstract Wars and conflict have existed since the beginning of time. Most battlefield conservation work is done for battlefields that lie in the borders of the nations that were involved, thus fostering citizens’ personal ties with the site and their national identities. However, some areas of the w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Wen Wang, Jesse DiMeolo, Gao Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-07-01
Series:Built Heritage
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00031-z
id doaj-debbbda6830a430d9f228b5ced790706
record_format Article
spelling doaj-debbbda6830a430d9f228b5ced7907062021-08-01T11:06:43ZengSpringerOpenBuilt Heritage2096-30412662-68022021-07-015112010.1186/s43238-021-00031-zIssues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and MalaysiaYi-Wen Wang0Jesse DiMeolo1Gao Du2Department of Urban Planning & Design, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversityPlanning and Development Services Department, The City of College StationDepartment of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, based at Department of Urban Planning & Design, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversityAbstract Wars and conflict have existed since the beginning of time. Most battlefield conservation work is done for battlefields that lie in the borders of the nations that were involved, thus fostering citizens’ personal ties with the site and their national identities. However, some areas of the world suffer from conservation neglect because of the distance and separation between the battlefield’s location and the country to which it is relevant, thus creating a dislocated appreciation of heritage described by Price (J Confl Archaeol 1:181–196, 2005) as ‘orphan heritage’. This paper questions the extent to which post-colonial nations are willing to protect and conserve World War II battlefields on their soil. It examines two battlefields in Asia—the Gin Drinkers’ Line in Hong Kong, China, and the Green Ridge battlefield in Kampar, Malaysia—that have been the subject of campaigns to recognise their transnational heritage value. Both battles involved multinational Allied forces led by the British against Japanese troops. A combination of political and economic factors has influenced how the two battlefields are understood and appreciated by citizens and local governments in the host nations. The paper delineates how these two Asian battlegrounds, which are relatively unknown to the general public, have been brought to the public’s attention and by whom as well as how the local governments have handled the demand to safeguard the battlefields. We argue that the global nature of WWII makes its commemoration geographically challenging and politically contentious. The WWII battlefields in Asia attest to the historical authenticity of past conflicts and thus should be conserved as neutrally as possible. The successful protection of battlefields in Malaysia and Hong Kong thus far can be largely attributed to grassroots initiatives, pressure from stakeholder countries, such as the UK, and academic research whereby the significance of the battleground is made known to people in Hong Kong and Malaysia. With public support, responsible government leadership and a shared understanding of their importance as transnational heritage, WWII battlefields can help calm bitter resentment and promote reconciliation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00031-zWorld war IIbattlefieldsconservationtransnational heritagepost-colonial countries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yi-Wen Wang
Jesse DiMeolo
Gao Du
spellingShingle Yi-Wen Wang
Jesse DiMeolo
Gao Du
Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
Built Heritage
World war II
battlefields
conservation
transnational heritage
post-colonial countries
author_facet Yi-Wen Wang
Jesse DiMeolo
Gao Du
author_sort Yi-Wen Wang
title Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
title_short Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
title_full Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
title_fullStr Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in Asia: WWII battlefield conservation in Hong Kong and Malaysia
title_sort issues in conserving ‘orphan heritage’ in asia: wwii battlefield conservation in hong kong and malaysia
publisher SpringerOpen
series Built Heritage
issn 2096-3041
2662-6802
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Wars and conflict have existed since the beginning of time. Most battlefield conservation work is done for battlefields that lie in the borders of the nations that were involved, thus fostering citizens’ personal ties with the site and their national identities. However, some areas of the world suffer from conservation neglect because of the distance and separation between the battlefield’s location and the country to which it is relevant, thus creating a dislocated appreciation of heritage described by Price (J Confl Archaeol 1:181–196, 2005) as ‘orphan heritage’. This paper questions the extent to which post-colonial nations are willing to protect and conserve World War II battlefields on their soil. It examines two battlefields in Asia—the Gin Drinkers’ Line in Hong Kong, China, and the Green Ridge battlefield in Kampar, Malaysia—that have been the subject of campaigns to recognise their transnational heritage value. Both battles involved multinational Allied forces led by the British against Japanese troops. A combination of political and economic factors has influenced how the two battlefields are understood and appreciated by citizens and local governments in the host nations. The paper delineates how these two Asian battlegrounds, which are relatively unknown to the general public, have been brought to the public’s attention and by whom as well as how the local governments have handled the demand to safeguard the battlefields. We argue that the global nature of WWII makes its commemoration geographically challenging and politically contentious. The WWII battlefields in Asia attest to the historical authenticity of past conflicts and thus should be conserved as neutrally as possible. The successful protection of battlefields in Malaysia and Hong Kong thus far can be largely attributed to grassroots initiatives, pressure from stakeholder countries, such as the UK, and academic research whereby the significance of the battleground is made known to people in Hong Kong and Malaysia. With public support, responsible government leadership and a shared understanding of their importance as transnational heritage, WWII battlefields can help calm bitter resentment and promote reconciliation.
topic World war II
battlefields
conservation
transnational heritage
post-colonial countries
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00031-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yiwenwang issuesinconservingorphanheritageinasiawwiibattlefieldconservationinhongkongandmalaysia
AT jessedimeolo issuesinconservingorphanheritageinasiawwiibattlefieldconservationinhongkongandmalaysia
AT gaodu issuesinconservingorphanheritageinasiawwiibattlefieldconservationinhongkongandmalaysia
_version_ 1721246359640604672