To Refer or Not to Refer, That Is the (Preliminary) Question: Exploring Factors Which Influence the Participation of National Judges in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure
This paper explores factors that either motivate or constrain national judges’ participation in the preliminary ruling procedure. By incorporating insights and evidence from American judicial politics literature and drawing from three models of judicial decision making: the attitudinal model, the te...
Main Author: | Monika Glavina |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/377 |
Similar Items
-
Conditions and Circumstances which Lead to Application to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Adoption of a Preliminary Ruling
by: Milinis Albertas, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Judicial Hierarchy in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure: Exploring the Relationship Between the First and Second Instance Courts
by: Monika Glavina
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Active or Passive: The National Judges' Expression of Opinions in the Preliminary Reference Procedure
by: Karin Leijon
Published: (2020-12-01) -
When Two Preliminary Questions Result in One and Half Answers: A 'Constitutional Tragedy' in Four Acts
by: Mariolina Eliantonio, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice
Published: (2021)