Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?

Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia and low-dose epidural analgesia in labor and study their effects on maternal and fetal well-being. Material and Methods: Sixty parturients classified as the American Society of Anesthesiolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jerry Joseph Joel, Narjeet K Osahan, Ekta Rai, Priyanka Daniel, Sunimal Bhaggien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2019;volume=6;issue=3;spage=156;epage=161;aulast=Joel
id doaj-dea4ed30e86c4b28aa892663ddc5c4a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dea4ed30e86c4b28aa892663ddc5c4a62020-11-25T02:07:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCHRISMED Journal of Health and Research2348-33342348-506X2019-01-016315616110.4103/cjhr.cjhr_99_18Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?Jerry Joseph JoelNarjeet K OsahanEkta RaiPriyanka DanielSunimal BhaggienAims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia and low-dose epidural analgesia in labor and study their effects on maternal and fetal well-being. Material and Methods: Sixty parturients classified as the American Society of Anesthesiologists I, in established labor and requesting epidural, were alternately divided into two groups (30 each). Group I received 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 ug/ml epidural analgesia. Group II received CSE analgesia comprising of 25 μg fentanyl in the intrathecal space and 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 ug/ml for epidural analgesia. Onset of analgesia, maternal hemodynamics, fetal heart rate, duration of labor, ambulation, incidence of cesarean section, instrumental delivery, side effects, and total dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl used were recorded. Results: Onset of analgesia in CSE group (1.48 ± 0.46 min) was significantly faster compared to the epidural group (3.87 ± 0.83 min). Duration of the first stage of labor was shorter in the CSE group (218.93 ± 78.15 min) compared to epidural group (308.03 ± 147). No significant difference between the groups was found in hemodynamic effects, duration of the second stage of labor, or in maternal and neonatal outcomes. Pruritus was seen in 50% of CSE patients. Mean total bupivacaine used in CSE group was significantly lesser than that used in Group I (56.750 ± 22.33 mg vs. 79.325 ± 28.81 mg). Conclusion: Both CSE and epidural analgesia provide comparable pain relief and maternal and fetal outcomes. CSE can be beneficial for parturients coming in advanced labor as its onset of action is faster.http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2019;volume=6;issue=3;spage=156;epage=161;aulast=JoelCombined spinal epiduralepidurallabor analgesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jerry Joseph Joel
Narjeet K Osahan
Ekta Rai
Priyanka Daniel
Sunimal Bhaggien
spellingShingle Jerry Joseph Joel
Narjeet K Osahan
Ekta Rai
Priyanka Daniel
Sunimal Bhaggien
Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
Combined spinal epidural
epidural
labor analgesia
author_facet Jerry Joseph Joel
Narjeet K Osahan
Ekta Rai
Priyanka Daniel
Sunimal Bhaggien
author_sort Jerry Joseph Joel
title Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
title_short Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
title_full Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
title_fullStr Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
title_full_unstemmed Is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
title_sort is combined spinal-epidural more effective compared to epidural for labor analgesia?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
issn 2348-3334
2348-506X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia and low-dose epidural analgesia in labor and study their effects on maternal and fetal well-being. Material and Methods: Sixty parturients classified as the American Society of Anesthesiologists I, in established labor and requesting epidural, were alternately divided into two groups (30 each). Group I received 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 ug/ml epidural analgesia. Group II received CSE analgesia comprising of 25 μg fentanyl in the intrathecal space and 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 ug/ml for epidural analgesia. Onset of analgesia, maternal hemodynamics, fetal heart rate, duration of labor, ambulation, incidence of cesarean section, instrumental delivery, side effects, and total dose of bupivacaine and fentanyl used were recorded. Results: Onset of analgesia in CSE group (1.48 ± 0.46 min) was significantly faster compared to the epidural group (3.87 ± 0.83 min). Duration of the first stage of labor was shorter in the CSE group (218.93 ± 78.15 min) compared to epidural group (308.03 ± 147). No significant difference between the groups was found in hemodynamic effects, duration of the second stage of labor, or in maternal and neonatal outcomes. Pruritus was seen in 50% of CSE patients. Mean total bupivacaine used in CSE group was significantly lesser than that used in Group I (56.750 ± 22.33 mg vs. 79.325 ± 28.81 mg). Conclusion: Both CSE and epidural analgesia provide comparable pain relief and maternal and fetal outcomes. CSE can be beneficial for parturients coming in advanced labor as its onset of action is faster.
topic Combined spinal epidural
epidural
labor analgesia
url http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2019;volume=6;issue=3;spage=156;epage=161;aulast=Joel
work_keys_str_mv AT jerryjosephjoel iscombinedspinalepiduralmoreeffectivecomparedtoepiduralforlaboranalgesia
AT narjeetkosahan iscombinedspinalepiduralmoreeffectivecomparedtoepiduralforlaboranalgesia
AT ektarai iscombinedspinalepiduralmoreeffectivecomparedtoepiduralforlaboranalgesia
AT priyankadaniel iscombinedspinalepiduralmoreeffectivecomparedtoepiduralforlaboranalgesia
AT sunimalbhaggien iscombinedspinalepiduralmoreeffectivecomparedtoepiduralforlaboranalgesia
_version_ 1724929649103863808