Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit

Nanoimprint lithography has become a useful tool to prepare elements containing nanoscale features at quite reasonable cost, especially if the fabrication elements are created in the own laboratory. We have designed and fabricated a whole nanoimprint manufacturing system and analyzed the resulting s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Caño-García, Morten A. Geday, Manuel Gil-Valverde, Xabier Quintana, José M. Otón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Beilstein-Institut 2018-05-01
Series:Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.149
id doaj-de96d95b0616461a83323fe84988b116
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de96d95b0616461a83323fe84988b1162020-11-25T00:03:48ZengBeilstein-InstitutBeilstein Journal of Nanotechnology2190-42862018-05-01911573158110.3762/bjnano.9.1492190-4286-9-149Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unitManuel Caño-García0Morten A. Geday1Manuel Gil-Valverde2Xabier Quintana3José M. Otón4CEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040-Madrid, SpainCEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040-Madrid, SpainCEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040-Madrid, SpainCEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040-Madrid, SpainCEMDATIC, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040-Madrid, SpainNanoimprint lithography has become a useful tool to prepare elements containing nanoscale features at quite reasonable cost, especially if the fabrication elements are created in the own laboratory. We have designed and fabricated a whole nanoimprint manufacturing system and analyzed the resulting surfaces using ad hoc packages developed on an open-software AFM image analysis suite. To complete the work, a number of polymers have been thoroughly studied in order to select the best material for this implementation. It turned out that the best alternative was not always the same, but depended on the application. A comparative study of the polymers, which takes into account the values and dispersion of numerous sample parameters, has been carried out. As a large number of samples was prepared, an automatized procedure for characterization of nanoimprint surfaces had to be set up. The procedure includes figures of merit for comparative purposes. Materials without the requirement of a solvent were found to be superior for most nanoimprint applications. A large dispersion of the samples was found.https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.149nanoimprintoriented gradientphotoresistpolymerreplica
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Caño-García
Morten A. Geday
Manuel Gil-Valverde
Xabier Quintana
José M. Otón
spellingShingle Manuel Caño-García
Morten A. Geday
Manuel Gil-Valverde
Xabier Quintana
José M. Otón
Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
nanoimprint
oriented gradient
photoresist
polymer
replica
author_facet Manuel Caño-García
Morten A. Geday
Manuel Gil-Valverde
Xabier Quintana
José M. Otón
author_sort Manuel Caño-García
title Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
title_short Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
title_full Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
title_fullStr Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3D-printed nanoimprint unit
title_sort evaluation of replicas manufactured in a 3d-printed nanoimprint unit
publisher Beilstein-Institut
series Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
issn 2190-4286
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Nanoimprint lithography has become a useful tool to prepare elements containing nanoscale features at quite reasonable cost, especially if the fabrication elements are created in the own laboratory. We have designed and fabricated a whole nanoimprint manufacturing system and analyzed the resulting surfaces using ad hoc packages developed on an open-software AFM image analysis suite. To complete the work, a number of polymers have been thoroughly studied in order to select the best material for this implementation. It turned out that the best alternative was not always the same, but depended on the application. A comparative study of the polymers, which takes into account the values and dispersion of numerous sample parameters, has been carried out. As a large number of samples was prepared, an automatized procedure for characterization of nanoimprint surfaces had to be set up. The procedure includes figures of merit for comparative purposes. Materials without the requirement of a solvent were found to be superior for most nanoimprint applications. A large dispersion of the samples was found.
topic nanoimprint
oriented gradient
photoresist
polymer
replica
url https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.149
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelcanogarcia evaluationofreplicasmanufacturedina3dprintednanoimprintunit
AT mortenageday evaluationofreplicasmanufacturedina3dprintednanoimprintunit
AT manuelgilvalverde evaluationofreplicasmanufacturedina3dprintednanoimprintunit
AT xabierquintana evaluationofreplicasmanufacturedina3dprintednanoimprintunit
AT josemoton evaluationofreplicasmanufacturedina3dprintednanoimprintunit
_version_ 1725431993202638848