A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages

Abstract Background In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun Sun, Qiuan Wang, Dazhao Cai, Wenxiang Gu, Yiming Ma, Yang Sun, Yangyang Wei, Feng Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2
id doaj-de930056cd8b48a78ba4ac1a10003b82
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de930056cd8b48a78ba4ac1a10003b822021-05-02T11:18:06ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742021-04-0122111410.1186/s12891-021-04244-2A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cagesJun Sun0Qiuan Wang1Dazhao Cai2Wenxiang Gu3Yiming Ma4Yang Sun5Yangyang Wei6Feng Yuan7Departments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityDepartments of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityAbstract Background In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages. Methods The finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure. Results The ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage’s and endplate-cage interface’s stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages. Conclusion The application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage’s stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2Fusion cageCervical spineFinite element analysisBiomechanics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun Sun
Qiuan Wang
Dazhao Cai
Wenxiang Gu
Yiming Ma
Yang Sun
Yangyang Wei
Feng Yuan
spellingShingle Jun Sun
Qiuan Wang
Dazhao Cai
Wenxiang Gu
Yiming Ma
Yang Sun
Yangyang Wei
Feng Yuan
A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Fusion cage
Cervical spine
Finite element analysis
Biomechanics
author_facet Jun Sun
Qiuan Wang
Dazhao Cai
Wenxiang Gu
Yiming Ma
Yang Sun
Yangyang Wei
Feng Yuan
author_sort Jun Sun
title A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
title_short A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
title_full A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
title_fullStr A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
title_full_unstemmed A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
title_sort lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with zk60 and ti-6al-4v cages
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages. Methods The finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure. Results The ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage’s and endplate-cage interface’s stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages. Conclusion The application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage’s stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization.
topic Fusion cage
Cervical spine
Finite element analysis
Biomechanics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2
work_keys_str_mv AT junsun alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT qiuanwang alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT dazhaocai alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT wenxianggu alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yimingma alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yangsun alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yangyangwei alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT fengyuan alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT junsun latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT qiuanwang latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT dazhaocai latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT wenxianggu latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yimingma latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yangsun latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT yangyangwei latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
AT fengyuan latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages
_version_ 1721492452602281984