Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials

Abstract The uncertainty regarding the effects and risks of nanomaterials on human health and the environment, and how they should be tested and assessed in the context of current regulations, is clearly holding back the full exploitation of the innovative potential of nanomaterials. To reduce this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom Van Teunenbroek, James Baker, Aart Dijkzeul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12989-017-0235-z
id doaj-de7ef69bb9254bb29c66d54b1f75fdbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de7ef69bb9254bb29c66d54b1f75fdbf2020-11-24T21:49:13ZengBMCParticle and Fibre Toxicology1743-89772017-12-011411510.1186/s12989-017-0235-zTowards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterialsTom Van Teunenbroek0James Baker1Aart Dijkzeul2Ministry of Infrastructure and the EnvironmentNanotechnology Industries Association (NIA)Ministry of Infrastructure and the EnvironmentAbstract The uncertainty regarding the effects and risks of nanomaterials on human health and the environment, and how they should be tested and assessed in the context of current regulations, is clearly holding back the full exploitation of the innovative potential of nanomaterials. To reduce this uncertainty, the European Union funded NANoREG and ProSafe projects (jointly referred to as N1P) have made a critical evaluation of methods to test and assess these risks in the context of the current registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) regulation. Where essential methods were lacking, new ones have been developed. For several existing methods, adjustments have been proposed. Possible improvements to the REACH regulation have also been identified in these projects. The results of N1P have been translated into recommendations for (European) policy makers and regulators. Part of them have a “no regret” character, meaning that the proposed actions can be considered as necessary, feasible, effective and cost efficient. The recommended measures proposed for data quality and data management will create a more solid information basis for risk assessment of nanomaterials. When implemented, the recommendations regarding REACH will improve the application of REACH in both a legal and scientific sense. In practical terms however, the application of REACH will remain complex, time-consuming and costly. Besides that, adapting and specifying the information requirements and test methods in REACH for nanomaterials that are now on the market, will not solve the regulatory hurdles for next generation (nano) materials. To better align the dynamic character of developing new materials and the static character of regulations, it is recommended to explore possibilities of a more future proof approach for securing the safety of new (nano) materials.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12989-017-0235-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tom Van Teunenbroek
James Baker
Aart Dijkzeul
spellingShingle Tom Van Teunenbroek
James Baker
Aart Dijkzeul
Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
author_facet Tom Van Teunenbroek
James Baker
Aart Dijkzeul
author_sort Tom Van Teunenbroek
title Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
title_short Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
title_full Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
title_fullStr Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
title_full_unstemmed Towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
title_sort towards a more effective and efficient governance and regulation of nanomaterials
publisher BMC
series Particle and Fibre Toxicology
issn 1743-8977
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract The uncertainty regarding the effects and risks of nanomaterials on human health and the environment, and how they should be tested and assessed in the context of current regulations, is clearly holding back the full exploitation of the innovative potential of nanomaterials. To reduce this uncertainty, the European Union funded NANoREG and ProSafe projects (jointly referred to as N1P) have made a critical evaluation of methods to test and assess these risks in the context of the current registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) regulation. Where essential methods were lacking, new ones have been developed. For several existing methods, adjustments have been proposed. Possible improvements to the REACH regulation have also been identified in these projects. The results of N1P have been translated into recommendations for (European) policy makers and regulators. Part of them have a “no regret” character, meaning that the proposed actions can be considered as necessary, feasible, effective and cost efficient. The recommended measures proposed for data quality and data management will create a more solid information basis for risk assessment of nanomaterials. When implemented, the recommendations regarding REACH will improve the application of REACH in both a legal and scientific sense. In practical terms however, the application of REACH will remain complex, time-consuming and costly. Besides that, adapting and specifying the information requirements and test methods in REACH for nanomaterials that are now on the market, will not solve the regulatory hurdles for next generation (nano) materials. To better align the dynamic character of developing new materials and the static character of regulations, it is recommended to explore possibilities of a more future proof approach for securing the safety of new (nano) materials.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12989-017-0235-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tomvanteunenbroek towardsamoreeffectiveandefficientgovernanceandregulationofnanomaterials
AT jamesbaker towardsamoreeffectiveandefficientgovernanceandregulationofnanomaterials
AT aartdijkzeul towardsamoreeffectiveandefficientgovernanceandregulationofnanomaterials
_version_ 1725888784604594176