Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.

Sensory systems often detect multiple types of inputs. For example, a receptor in a cell-signaling system often binds multiple kinds of ligands, and sensory neurons can respond to different types of stimuli. How do sensory systems compare these different kinds of signals? Here, we consider this ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuval Hart, Avraham E Mayo, Oren Shoval, Uri Alon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3587607?pdf=render
id doaj-de6b91b7476348f4850f2bfbd9f2f46e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de6b91b7476348f4850f2bfbd9f2f46e2020-11-24T21:42:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0183e5745510.1371/journal.pone.0057455Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.Yuval HartAvraham E MayoOren ShovalUri AlonSensory systems often detect multiple types of inputs. For example, a receptor in a cell-signaling system often binds multiple kinds of ligands, and sensory neurons can respond to different types of stimuli. How do sensory systems compare these different kinds of signals? Here, we consider this question in a class of sensory systems - including bacterial chemotaxis- which have a property known as fold-change detection: their output dynamics, including amplitude and response time, depends only on the relative changes in signal, rather than absolute changes, over a range of several decades of signal. We analyze how fold-change detection systems respond to multiple signals, using mathematical models. Suppose that a step of fold F1 is made in input 1, together with a step of F2 in input 2. What total response does the system provide? We show that when both input signals impact the same receptor with equal number of binding sites, the integrated response is multiplicative: the response dynamics depend only on the product of the two fold changes, F1F2. When the inputs bind the same receptor with different number of sites n1 and n2, the dynamics depend on a product of power laws, [Formula: see text]. Thus, two input signals which vary over time in an inverse way can lead to no response. When the two inputs affect two different receptors, other types of integration may be found and generally the system is not constrained to respond according to the product of the fold-change of each signal. These predictions can be readily tested experimentally, by providing cells with two simultaneously varying input signals. The present study suggests how cells can compare apples and oranges, namely by comparing each to its own background level, and then multiplying these two fold-changes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3587607?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuval Hart
Avraham E Mayo
Oren Shoval
Uri Alon
spellingShingle Yuval Hart
Avraham E Mayo
Oren Shoval
Uri Alon
Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yuval Hart
Avraham E Mayo
Oren Shoval
Uri Alon
author_sort Yuval Hart
title Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
title_short Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
title_full Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
title_fullStr Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
title_sort comparing apples and oranges: fold-change detection of multiple simultaneous inputs.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Sensory systems often detect multiple types of inputs. For example, a receptor in a cell-signaling system often binds multiple kinds of ligands, and sensory neurons can respond to different types of stimuli. How do sensory systems compare these different kinds of signals? Here, we consider this question in a class of sensory systems - including bacterial chemotaxis- which have a property known as fold-change detection: their output dynamics, including amplitude and response time, depends only on the relative changes in signal, rather than absolute changes, over a range of several decades of signal. We analyze how fold-change detection systems respond to multiple signals, using mathematical models. Suppose that a step of fold F1 is made in input 1, together with a step of F2 in input 2. What total response does the system provide? We show that when both input signals impact the same receptor with equal number of binding sites, the integrated response is multiplicative: the response dynamics depend only on the product of the two fold changes, F1F2. When the inputs bind the same receptor with different number of sites n1 and n2, the dynamics depend on a product of power laws, [Formula: see text]. Thus, two input signals which vary over time in an inverse way can lead to no response. When the two inputs affect two different receptors, other types of integration may be found and generally the system is not constrained to respond according to the product of the fold-change of each signal. These predictions can be readily tested experimentally, by providing cells with two simultaneously varying input signals. The present study suggests how cells can compare apples and oranges, namely by comparing each to its own background level, and then multiplying these two fold-changes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3587607?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuvalhart comparingapplesandorangesfoldchangedetectionofmultiplesimultaneousinputs
AT avrahamemayo comparingapplesandorangesfoldchangedetectionofmultiplesimultaneousinputs
AT orenshoval comparingapplesandorangesfoldchangedetectionofmultiplesimultaneousinputs
AT urialon comparingapplesandorangesfoldchangedetectionofmultiplesimultaneousinputs
_version_ 1725917657925943296