Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review

Abstract Evidence-based design (EBD) of hospitals could significantly improve patient safety and make patient, staff and family environments healthier. This systematic review aims to determine which neonatal intensive care unit design features lead to improved neonatal, parental and staff outcomes....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. O’Callaghan, A. Dee, R. K. Philip
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40748-019-0101-0
id doaj-de5a157a589948a3a6a655d759048dc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de5a157a589948a3a6a655d759048dc22020-11-25T02:10:35ZengBMCMaternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology2054-958X2019-04-01511910.1186/s40748-019-0101-0Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic reviewN. O’Callaghan0A. Dee1R. K. Philip2Mid-West Department of Public Health, HSEMid-West Department of Public Health, HSEGraduate Entry Medical School (GEMS), University of LimerickAbstract Evidence-based design (EBD) of hospitals could significantly improve patient safety and make patient, staff and family environments healthier. This systematic review aims to determine which neonatal intensive care unit design features lead to improved neonatal, parental and staff outcomes. Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Registry, were searched in January 2017. Using combinations of the relevant key words, review was performed following the recommended guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. English language limitation was applied and term limited to 2006–2016. Included studies were assigned a grade based upon their level of evidence and critically appraised using defined tools. Data were not synthesized for meta-analysis due to nature of literature reviewed and heterogeneity. Three thousand five hundred ninety-two titles were screened with 43 full-texts assessed for eligibility. Twenty nine studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. These included 19 cohort studies, two qualitative studies, seven cross-sectional studies, and one randomised control trial. Grey literature search from guidelines, and repositories yielded an additional 10 guidelines. ‘Single family room’ (SFR) design for neonatal units is recommended. An optimally designed neonatal unit has many possible health implications, including improved breastfeeding, infection and noise control, reduced length of stay, hospitalisation rates and potentially improved neonatal morbidity and mortality. High quality, family centred care (FCC) in neonatology could be assisted through well grounded, future proofed and technology enabled design concepts that have the potential to impact upon early life development.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40748-019-0101-0Evidence-based designFamily centred careSingle family roomOpen bay unitHospital designNeonatal intensive care unit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. O’Callaghan
A. Dee
R. K. Philip
spellingShingle N. O’Callaghan
A. Dee
R. K. Philip
Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology
Evidence-based design
Family centred care
Single family room
Open bay unit
Hospital design
Neonatal intensive care unit
author_facet N. O’Callaghan
A. Dee
R. K. Philip
author_sort N. O’Callaghan
title Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
title_short Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
title_full Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
title_fullStr Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
title_sort evidence-based design for neonatal units: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology
issn 2054-958X
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Evidence-based design (EBD) of hospitals could significantly improve patient safety and make patient, staff and family environments healthier. This systematic review aims to determine which neonatal intensive care unit design features lead to improved neonatal, parental and staff outcomes. Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science Citation Index and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Registry, were searched in January 2017. Using combinations of the relevant key words, review was performed following the recommended guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. English language limitation was applied and term limited to 2006–2016. Included studies were assigned a grade based upon their level of evidence and critically appraised using defined tools. Data were not synthesized for meta-analysis due to nature of literature reviewed and heterogeneity. Three thousand five hundred ninety-two titles were screened with 43 full-texts assessed for eligibility. Twenty nine studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. These included 19 cohort studies, two qualitative studies, seven cross-sectional studies, and one randomised control trial. Grey literature search from guidelines, and repositories yielded an additional 10 guidelines. ‘Single family room’ (SFR) design for neonatal units is recommended. An optimally designed neonatal unit has many possible health implications, including improved breastfeeding, infection and noise control, reduced length of stay, hospitalisation rates and potentially improved neonatal morbidity and mortality. High quality, family centred care (FCC) in neonatology could be assisted through well grounded, future proofed and technology enabled design concepts that have the potential to impact upon early life development.
topic Evidence-based design
Family centred care
Single family room
Open bay unit
Hospital design
Neonatal intensive care unit
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40748-019-0101-0
work_keys_str_mv AT nocallaghan evidencebaseddesignforneonatalunitsasystematicreview
AT adee evidencebaseddesignforneonatalunitsasystematicreview
AT rkphilip evidencebaseddesignforneonatalunitsasystematicreview
_version_ 1724918830042447872