Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker

Purpose. To assess the MRI issues at 3 Tesla for a metallic tissue marker used to localize removal areas of tissue abnormalities. Materials and Methods. A newly designed, metallic tissue marker (Achieve Marker, CareFusion, Vernon Hills, IL) used to mark biopsy sites, particularly in breasts, was ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte M. Cronenweth, Frank G. Shellock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Breast Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/823759
id doaj-de577c82372e46a398de95bfdb38bac2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de577c82372e46a398de95bfdb38bac22020-11-24T22:08:33ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Breast Cancer2090-31702090-31892015-01-01201510.1155/2015/823759823759Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue MarkerCharlotte M. Cronenweth0Frank G. Shellock1Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USAKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California and Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research, 7751 Veragua Drive, Playa Del Rey, CA 90293, USAPurpose. To assess the MRI issues at 3 Tesla for a metallic tissue marker used to localize removal areas of tissue abnormalities. Materials and Methods. A newly designed, metallic tissue marker (Achieve Marker, CareFusion, Vernon Hills, IL) used to mark biopsy sites, particularly in breasts, was assessed for MRI issues which included standardized tests to determine magnetic field interactions (i.e., translational attraction and torque), MRI-related heating, and artifacts at 3 Tesla. Temperature changes were determined for the marker using a gelled-saline-filled phantom. MRI was performed at a relatively high specific absorption rate (whole body averaged SAR, 2.9-W/kg). MRI artifacts were evaluated using T1-weighted, spin echo and gradient echo pulse sequences. Results. The marker displayed minimal magnetic field interactions (2-degree deflection angle and no torque). MRI-related heating was only 0.1°C above background heating (i.e., the heating without the tissue marker present). Artifacts seen as localized signal loss were relatively small in relation to the size and shape of the marker. Conclusions. Based on the findings, the new metallic tissue marker is acceptable or “MR Conditional” (using current labeling terminology) for a patient undergoing an MRI procedure at 3 Tesla or less.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/823759
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charlotte M. Cronenweth
Frank G. Shellock
spellingShingle Charlotte M. Cronenweth
Frank G. Shellock
Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
International Journal of Breast Cancer
author_facet Charlotte M. Cronenweth
Frank G. Shellock
author_sort Charlotte M. Cronenweth
title Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
title_short Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
title_full Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
title_fullStr Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of MRI Issues at 3 Tesla for a New Metallic Tissue Marker
title_sort assessment of mri issues at 3 tesla for a new metallic tissue marker
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Breast Cancer
issn 2090-3170
2090-3189
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Purpose. To assess the MRI issues at 3 Tesla for a metallic tissue marker used to localize removal areas of tissue abnormalities. Materials and Methods. A newly designed, metallic tissue marker (Achieve Marker, CareFusion, Vernon Hills, IL) used to mark biopsy sites, particularly in breasts, was assessed for MRI issues which included standardized tests to determine magnetic field interactions (i.e., translational attraction and torque), MRI-related heating, and artifacts at 3 Tesla. Temperature changes were determined for the marker using a gelled-saline-filled phantom. MRI was performed at a relatively high specific absorption rate (whole body averaged SAR, 2.9-W/kg). MRI artifacts were evaluated using T1-weighted, spin echo and gradient echo pulse sequences. Results. The marker displayed minimal magnetic field interactions (2-degree deflection angle and no torque). MRI-related heating was only 0.1°C above background heating (i.e., the heating without the tissue marker present). Artifacts seen as localized signal loss were relatively small in relation to the size and shape of the marker. Conclusions. Based on the findings, the new metallic tissue marker is acceptable or “MR Conditional” (using current labeling terminology) for a patient undergoing an MRI procedure at 3 Tesla or less.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/823759
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottemcronenweth assessmentofmriissuesat3teslaforanewmetallictissuemarker
AT frankgshellock assessmentofmriissuesat3teslaforanewmetallictissuemarker
_version_ 1725816066691563520