La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
The essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first ti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Noctua |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5 |
id |
doaj-de556b360ef743d69af7402dd6d36e06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-de556b360ef743d69af7402dd6d36e062021-09-08T15:11:02ZdeuE-theca OnLineOpenAccess EdizioniNoctua2284-11802016-08-01III216423810.14640/NoctuaIII5La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)Franco Bacchelli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-004XUniversità di BolognaThe essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first time, one on the Sun God and another on the classification of the religions professed by humanity, alongside two small inedited letters by Plethon. In the first of the two writings, Kavàkis clears the reasons for his aversion towards any kind of religion or philosophy that places the divine beyond the visible world and that believes in the existence of an intelligible or, even worse, over-intelligible world. These ideas lead him to clash not only with Christianity, but also with Plato and with the ideas of his beloved teacher Plethon, who, however, seems to agree with him in a dream. In the second writing this peculiar solar religion is reaffirmed, against the religion of poets and the religions of transcendence, warning however that nature wants some respect for the religion of ancestors, whichever this might be, when it is functional to the life of the society and of the State.https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5christianitydemetrios kavàkis rhaoulneo-platonismplatogemistus plethon |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Franco Bacchelli |
spellingShingle |
Franco Bacchelli La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) Noctua christianity demetrios kavàkis rhaoul neo-platonism plato gemistus plethon |
author_facet |
Franco Bacchelli |
author_sort |
Franco Bacchelli |
title |
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) |
title_short |
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) |
title_full |
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) |
title_fullStr |
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) |
title_full_unstemmed |
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon) |
title_sort |
la considération céleste et les enseignements de démétrius rhaoul kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de gemistus plethon) |
publisher |
E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni |
series |
Noctua |
issn |
2284-1180 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
The essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first time, one on the Sun God and another on the classification of the religions professed by humanity, alongside two small inedited letters by Plethon. In the first of the two writings, Kavàkis clears the reasons for his aversion towards any kind of religion or philosophy that places the divine beyond the visible world and that believes in the existence of an intelligible or, even worse, over-intelligible world. These ideas lead him to clash not only with Christianity, but also with Plato and with the ideas of his beloved teacher Plethon, who, however, seems to agree with him in a dream. In the second writing this peculiar solar religion is reaffirmed, against the religion of poets and the religions of transcendence, warning however that nature wants some respect for the religion of ancestors, whichever this might be, when it is functional to the life of the society and of the State. |
topic |
christianity demetrios kavàkis rhaoul neo-platonism plato gemistus plethon |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francobacchelli laconsiderationcelesteetlesenseignementsdedemetriusrhaoulkavakisavecdeuxlettresineditesdegemistusplethon |
_version_ |
1717762092216352768 |