La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)

The essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first ti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franco Bacchelli
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni 2016-08-01
Series:Noctua
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5
id doaj-de556b360ef743d69af7402dd6d36e06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de556b360ef743d69af7402dd6d36e062021-09-08T15:11:02ZdeuE-theca OnLineOpenAccess EdizioniNoctua2284-11802016-08-01III216423810.14640/NoctuaIII5La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)Franco Bacchelli0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-004XUniversità di BolognaThe essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first time, one on the Sun God and another on the classification of the religions professed by humanity, alongside two small inedited letters by Plethon. In the first of the two writings, Kavàkis clears the reasons for his aversion towards any kind of religion or philosophy that places the divine beyond the visible world and that believes in the existence of an intelligible or, even worse, over-intelligible world. These ideas lead him to clash not only with Christianity, but also with Plato and with the ideas of his beloved teacher Plethon, who, however, seems to agree with him in a dream. In the second writing this peculiar solar religion is reaffirmed, against the religion of poets and the religions of transcendence, warning however that nature wants some respect for the religion of ancestors, whichever this might be, when it is functional to the life of the society and of the State.https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5christianitydemetrios kavàkis rhaoulneo-platonismplatogemistus plethon
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franco Bacchelli
spellingShingle Franco Bacchelli
La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
Noctua
christianity
demetrios kavàkis rhaoul
neo-platonism
plato
gemistus plethon
author_facet Franco Bacchelli
author_sort Franco Bacchelli
title La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
title_short La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
title_full La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
title_fullStr La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
title_full_unstemmed La Considération céleste et les Enseignements de Démétrius Rhaoul Kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de Gemistus Plethon)
title_sort la considération céleste et les enseignements de démétrius rhaoul kavàkis (avec deux lettres inédites de gemistus plethon)
publisher E-theca OnLineOpenAccess Edizioni
series Noctua
issn 2284-1180
publishDate 2016-08-01
description The essay illustrates the figure of Demetrios Kavàkis Rhaoul (1416–1506), Byzantine official at the service of the last two Paleologue emperors and of the Despots of the Peloponnese, who was also George Gemistos Plethon’s friend and student. Two short works of his are here published for the first time, one on the Sun God and another on the classification of the religions professed by humanity, alongside two small inedited letters by Plethon. In the first of the two writings, Kavàkis clears the reasons for his aversion towards any kind of religion or philosophy that places the divine beyond the visible world and that believes in the existence of an intelligible or, even worse, over-intelligible world. These ideas lead him to clash not only with Christianity, but also with Plato and with the ideas of his beloved teacher Plethon, who, however, seems to agree with him in a dream. In the second writing this peculiar solar religion is reaffirmed, against the religion of poets and the religions of transcendence, warning however that nature wants some respect for the religion of ancestors, whichever this might be, when it is functional to the life of the society and of the State.
topic christianity
demetrios kavàkis rhaoul
neo-platonism
plato
gemistus plethon
url https://dx.doi.org/10.14640/NoctuaIII5
work_keys_str_mv AT francobacchelli laconsiderationcelesteetlesenseignementsdedemetriusrhaoulkavakisavecdeuxlettresineditesdegemistusplethon
_version_ 1717762092216352768