Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands

The application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine regi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William P. Megarry, Gabriel Cooney, Douglas C. Comer, Carey E. Priebe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529
id doaj-de48663e60b5495b853193a8e465cb93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de48663e60b5495b853193a8e465cb932020-11-24T21:33:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922016-06-018652910.3390/rs8060529rs8060529Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland IslandsWilliam P. Megarry0Gabriel Cooney1Douglas C. Comer2Carey E. Priebe3Cultural Site Research and Management, 2113 St Paul, Baltimore, MD 21218, USASchool of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandCultural Site Research and Management, 2113 St Paul, Baltimore, MD 21218, USADepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAThe application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine region of the Shetland Islands in Northern Scotland. Sample data from known workshops surveyed using differential GPS are used alongside known non-sites to train a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier based on a combination of datasets including Worldview-2 bands, band difference ratios (BDR) and topographical derivatives. Principal components analysis is further used to test and reduce dimensionality caused by redundant datasets. Probability models were generated by LDA using principal components and tested with sites identified through geological field survey. Testing shows the prospective ability of this technique and significance between 0.05 and 0.01, and gain statistics between 0.90 and 0.94, higher than those obtained using maximum likelihood and random forest classifiers. Results suggest that this approach is best suited to relatively homogenous site types, and performs better with correlated data sources. Finally, by combining posterior probability models and least-cost analysis, a survey least-cost efficacy model is generated showing the utility of such approaches to archaeological field survey.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529archaeological prospectionWorldview-2linear discriminant classificationprincipal components analysisstone tool workshopsarchaeological survey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William P. Megarry
Gabriel Cooney
Douglas C. Comer
Carey E. Priebe
spellingShingle William P. Megarry
Gabriel Cooney
Douglas C. Comer
Carey E. Priebe
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
Remote Sensing
archaeological prospection
Worldview-2
linear discriminant classification
principal components analysis
stone tool workshops
archaeological survey
author_facet William P. Megarry
Gabriel Cooney
Douglas C. Comer
Carey E. Priebe
author_sort William P. Megarry
title Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
title_short Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
title_full Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
title_fullStr Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
title_sort posterior probability modeling and image classification for archaeological site prospection: building a survey efficacy model for identifying neolithic felsite workshops in the shetland islands
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine region of the Shetland Islands in Northern Scotland. Sample data from known workshops surveyed using differential GPS are used alongside known non-sites to train a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier based on a combination of datasets including Worldview-2 bands, band difference ratios (BDR) and topographical derivatives. Principal components analysis is further used to test and reduce dimensionality caused by redundant datasets. Probability models were generated by LDA using principal components and tested with sites identified through geological field survey. Testing shows the prospective ability of this technique and significance between 0.05 and 0.01, and gain statistics between 0.90 and 0.94, higher than those obtained using maximum likelihood and random forest classifiers. Results suggest that this approach is best suited to relatively homogenous site types, and performs better with correlated data sources. Finally, by combining posterior probability models and least-cost analysis, a survey least-cost efficacy model is generated showing the utility of such approaches to archaeological field survey.
topic archaeological prospection
Worldview-2
linear discriminant classification
principal components analysis
stone tool workshops
archaeological survey
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529
work_keys_str_mv AT williampmegarry posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands
AT gabrielcooney posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands
AT douglasccomer posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands
AT careyepriebe posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands
_version_ 1725954256530309120