Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands
The application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine regi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529 |
id |
doaj-de48663e60b5495b853193a8e465cb93 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-de48663e60b5495b853193a8e465cb932020-11-24T21:33:13ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922016-06-018652910.3390/rs8060529rs8060529Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland IslandsWilliam P. Megarry0Gabriel Cooney1Douglas C. Comer2Carey E. Priebe3Cultural Site Research and Management, 2113 St Paul, Baltimore, MD 21218, USASchool of Archaeology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandCultural Site Research and Management, 2113 St Paul, Baltimore, MD 21218, USADepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAThe application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine region of the Shetland Islands in Northern Scotland. Sample data from known workshops surveyed using differential GPS are used alongside known non-sites to train a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier based on a combination of datasets including Worldview-2 bands, band difference ratios (BDR) and topographical derivatives. Principal components analysis is further used to test and reduce dimensionality caused by redundant datasets. Probability models were generated by LDA using principal components and tested with sites identified through geological field survey. Testing shows the prospective ability of this technique and significance between 0.05 and 0.01, and gain statistics between 0.90 and 0.94, higher than those obtained using maximum likelihood and random forest classifiers. Results suggest that this approach is best suited to relatively homogenous site types, and performs better with correlated data sources. Finally, by combining posterior probability models and least-cost analysis, a survey least-cost efficacy model is generated showing the utility of such approaches to archaeological field survey.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529archaeological prospectionWorldview-2linear discriminant classificationprincipal components analysisstone tool workshopsarchaeological survey |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
William P. Megarry Gabriel Cooney Douglas C. Comer Carey E. Priebe |
spellingShingle |
William P. Megarry Gabriel Cooney Douglas C. Comer Carey E. Priebe Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands Remote Sensing archaeological prospection Worldview-2 linear discriminant classification principal components analysis stone tool workshops archaeological survey |
author_facet |
William P. Megarry Gabriel Cooney Douglas C. Comer Carey E. Priebe |
author_sort |
William P. Megarry |
title |
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands |
title_short |
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands |
title_full |
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands |
title_fullStr |
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Posterior Probability Modeling and Image Classification for Archaeological Site Prospection: Building a Survey Efficacy Model for Identifying Neolithic Felsite Workshops in the Shetland Islands |
title_sort |
posterior probability modeling and image classification for archaeological site prospection: building a survey efficacy model for identifying neolithic felsite workshops in the shetland islands |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
The application of custom classification techniques and posterior probability modeling (PPM) using Worldview-2 multispectral imagery to archaeological field survey is presented in this paper. Research is focused on the identification of Neolithic felsite stone tool workshops in the North Mavine region of the Shetland Islands in Northern Scotland. Sample data from known workshops surveyed using differential GPS are used alongside known non-sites to train a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier based on a combination of datasets including Worldview-2 bands, band difference ratios (BDR) and topographical derivatives. Principal components analysis is further used to test and reduce dimensionality caused by redundant datasets. Probability models were generated by LDA using principal components and tested with sites identified through geological field survey. Testing shows the prospective ability of this technique and significance between 0.05 and 0.01, and gain statistics between 0.90 and 0.94, higher than those obtained using maximum likelihood and random forest classifiers. Results suggest that this approach is best suited to relatively homogenous site types, and performs better with correlated data sources. Finally, by combining posterior probability models and least-cost analysis, a survey least-cost efficacy model is generated showing the utility of such approaches to archaeological field survey. |
topic |
archaeological prospection Worldview-2 linear discriminant classification principal components analysis stone tool workshops archaeological survey |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/6/529 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT williampmegarry posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands AT gabrielcooney posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands AT douglasccomer posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands AT careyepriebe posteriorprobabilitymodelingandimageclassificationforarchaeologicalsiteprospectionbuildingasurveyefficacymodelforidentifyingneolithicfelsiteworkshopsintheshetlandislands |
_version_ |
1725954256530309120 |