Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer

Introduction Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Debi Bhattacharya, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Kumud Kantilal, Wendy Hardeman, Hattie Whiteside, Matthew Small
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037636.full
id doaj-de45e5d9c3f8422cb3a8c20d76ca23d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de45e5d9c3f8422cb3a8c20d76ca23d12021-07-21T16:01:44ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2020-037636Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancerDebi Bhattacharya0Eleni Karapanagiotou1Kumud Kantilal2Wendy Hardeman3Hattie Whiteside4Matthew Small52 School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Medical Oncology, Guy’s and Saint Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UKSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UKSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UKPharmacy department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UKIntroduction Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discussions. This review aims to understand what works for whom and in what circumstances in relation to practitioners engaging with supporting people living with and beyond cancer to self-manage long-term consequences of systemic anticancer treatment.Methods and analysis We will follow five steps for undertaking the realist review: (1) define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) evidence search, (4) selection and appraisal and (5) data extraction and synthesis. We will combine an informal literature search with a theory-based approach, using the theoretical domains framework, and stakeholder feedback to develop initial programme theories. We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases to September 2019, and supplement this with citation tracking, grey literature and practitioner surveys. Data selection will be based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanism and outcomes illuminated in the process. The results will be reported according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication standards.Ethics and dissemination We have received ethical approval through the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (ref 2 01 819-124). We will disseminate to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare organisations, cancer charities and patients to agree a strategy for disseminating to these groups.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019120910.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037636.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Debi Bhattacharya
Eleni Karapanagiotou
Kumud Kantilal
Wendy Hardeman
Hattie Whiteside
Matthew Small
spellingShingle Debi Bhattacharya
Eleni Karapanagiotou
Kumud Kantilal
Wendy Hardeman
Hattie Whiteside
Matthew Small
Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
BMJ Open
author_facet Debi Bhattacharya
Eleni Karapanagiotou
Kumud Kantilal
Wendy Hardeman
Hattie Whiteside
Matthew Small
author_sort Debi Bhattacharya
title Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_short Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_full Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_fullStr Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_full_unstemmed Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_sort realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Introduction Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discussions. This review aims to understand what works for whom and in what circumstances in relation to practitioners engaging with supporting people living with and beyond cancer to self-manage long-term consequences of systemic anticancer treatment.Methods and analysis We will follow five steps for undertaking the realist review: (1) define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) evidence search, (4) selection and appraisal and (5) data extraction and synthesis. We will combine an informal literature search with a theory-based approach, using the theoretical domains framework, and stakeholder feedback to develop initial programme theories. We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases to September 2019, and supplement this with citation tracking, grey literature and practitioner surveys. Data selection will be based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanism and outcomes illuminated in the process. The results will be reported according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication standards.Ethics and dissemination We have received ethical approval through the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (ref 2 01 819-124). We will disseminate to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare organisations, cancer charities and patients to agree a strategy for disseminating to these groups.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019120910.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e037636.full
work_keys_str_mv AT debibhattacharya realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT elenikarapanagiotou realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT kumudkantilal realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT wendyhardeman realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT hattiewhiteside realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT matthewsmall realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
_version_ 1721292565856124928