Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings

Domestic Hot Water (DHW) storage tanks are identified as a main source of flexible energy use in buildings. As a basis for energy management in apartment buildings, this paper describes the aggregated DHW use in a case building, and analyses the potential for DHW energy flexibility by simulating dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sørensen Åse Lekang, Walnum Harald Taxt, Sartori Igor, Andresen Inger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/22/e3sconf_hvac2021_11005.pdf
id doaj-de3bff4e852342daaad98a028892cbf0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de3bff4e852342daaad98a028892cbf02021-04-06T13:49:55ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012461100510.1051/e3sconf/202124611005e3sconf_hvac2021_11005Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildingsSørensen Åse LekangWalnum Harald Taxt0Sartori Igor1Andresen Inger2SINTEF, Department of Architectural EngineeringSINTEF, Department of Architectural EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Architecture and TechnologyDomestic Hot Water (DHW) storage tanks are identified as a main source of flexible energy use in buildings. As a basis for energy management in apartment buildings, this paper describes the aggregated DHW use in a case building, and analyses the potential for DHW energy flexibility by simulating different control options. The case study for the work is an apartment building in Oslo with 56 apartments and a shared DHW system. Energy measurements are available for consumed hot water, hot water circulation, and energy supplied to the DHW tanks. The measurements are presented with minute, hourly and daily values. Aggregated daily energy use for the consumed hot water is in average 362 kWh, while the energy supplied is 555 kWh. The potential for energy flexibility is analysed for a base case and for four different rule-based control options: Power limitation, Spot price savings, Flexibility sale and Solar energy. Economic consequences of the control options are compared. With the Norwegian tariff structure, maximum hourly power use has the main impact on the cost. Control systems that aim to reduce the maximum power use may be combined with spot price savings or to offer end-user flexibility services to the grid.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/22/e3sconf_hvac2021_11005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sørensen Åse Lekang
Walnum Harald Taxt
Sartori Igor
Andresen Inger
spellingShingle Sørensen Åse Lekang
Walnum Harald Taxt
Sartori Igor
Andresen Inger
Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Sørensen Åse Lekang
Walnum Harald Taxt
Sartori Igor
Andresen Inger
author_sort Sørensen Åse Lekang
title Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
title_short Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
title_full Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
title_fullStr Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
title_full_unstemmed Energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
title_sort energy flexibility potential of domestic hot water systems in apartment buildings
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Domestic Hot Water (DHW) storage tanks are identified as a main source of flexible energy use in buildings. As a basis for energy management in apartment buildings, this paper describes the aggregated DHW use in a case building, and analyses the potential for DHW energy flexibility by simulating different control options. The case study for the work is an apartment building in Oslo with 56 apartments and a shared DHW system. Energy measurements are available for consumed hot water, hot water circulation, and energy supplied to the DHW tanks. The measurements are presented with minute, hourly and daily values. Aggregated daily energy use for the consumed hot water is in average 362 kWh, while the energy supplied is 555 kWh. The potential for energy flexibility is analysed for a base case and for four different rule-based control options: Power limitation, Spot price savings, Flexibility sale and Solar energy. Economic consequences of the control options are compared. With the Norwegian tariff structure, maximum hourly power use has the main impact on the cost. Control systems that aim to reduce the maximum power use may be combined with spot price savings or to offer end-user flexibility services to the grid.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/22/e3sconf_hvac2021_11005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sørensenaselekang energyflexibilitypotentialofdomestichotwatersystemsinapartmentbuildings
AT walnumharaldtaxt energyflexibilitypotentialofdomestichotwatersystemsinapartmentbuildings
AT sartoriigor energyflexibilitypotentialofdomestichotwatersystemsinapartmentbuildings
AT andreseninger energyflexibilitypotentialofdomestichotwatersystemsinapartmentbuildings
_version_ 1721537940796997632