The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity

Due to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helena Tolkki, Arto Haveri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26
id doaj-de3b7729a37d4562bbc9a52601b5b777
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de3b7729a37d4562bbc9a52601b5b7772020-11-25T03:54:56ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872020-04-0110262610.3390/admsci10020026The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance CapacityHelena Tolkki0Arto Haveri1Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, FinlandDue to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state control and metropolitan governance capacity based on a comparative case study of four metropolitan areas: Auckland, Dublin, Montreal and Oslo. These areas represent different models of metropolitan governance, as well as different forms of state control. We studied state control by focusing on political and administrative decentralization: how independently can the metropolitan government make decisions and perform its tasks? The conclusion is that the different dimensions of decentralization are connected to capacity, but not straightforwardly. This study indicates that state involvement through different forms of control can increase metropolitan governance capacity, but only if it is combined with mandate and supportive policy actions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26metropolitan governancedecentralizationcapacitygovernance structurescontrol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helena Tolkki
Arto Haveri
spellingShingle Helena Tolkki
Arto Haveri
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
Administrative Sciences
metropolitan governance
decentralization
capacity
governance structures
control
author_facet Helena Tolkki
Arto Haveri
author_sort Helena Tolkki
title The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
title_short The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
title_full The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
title_fullStr The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
title_full_unstemmed The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
title_sort dynamics between state control and metropolitan governance capacity
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Due to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state control and metropolitan governance capacity based on a comparative case study of four metropolitan areas: Auckland, Dublin, Montreal and Oslo. These areas represent different models of metropolitan governance, as well as different forms of state control. We studied state control by focusing on political and administrative decentralization: how independently can the metropolitan government make decisions and perform its tasks? The conclusion is that the different dimensions of decentralization are connected to capacity, but not straightforwardly. This study indicates that state involvement through different forms of control can increase metropolitan governance capacity, but only if it is combined with mandate and supportive policy actions.
topic metropolitan governance
decentralization
capacity
governance structures
control
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26
work_keys_str_mv AT helenatolkki thedynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity
AT artohaveri thedynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity
AT helenatolkki dynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity
AT artohaveri dynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity
_version_ 1724471727476441088