The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity
Due to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state con...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Administrative Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26 |
id |
doaj-de3b7729a37d4562bbc9a52601b5b777 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-de3b7729a37d4562bbc9a52601b5b7772020-11-25T03:54:56ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872020-04-0110262610.3390/admsci10020026The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance CapacityHelena Tolkki0Arto Haveri1Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, FinlandFaculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, FinlandDue to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state control and metropolitan governance capacity based on a comparative case study of four metropolitan areas: Auckland, Dublin, Montreal and Oslo. These areas represent different models of metropolitan governance, as well as different forms of state control. We studied state control by focusing on political and administrative decentralization: how independently can the metropolitan government make decisions and perform its tasks? The conclusion is that the different dimensions of decentralization are connected to capacity, but not straightforwardly. This study indicates that state involvement through different forms of control can increase metropolitan governance capacity, but only if it is combined with mandate and supportive policy actions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26metropolitan governancedecentralizationcapacitygovernance structurescontrol |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Helena Tolkki Arto Haveri |
spellingShingle |
Helena Tolkki Arto Haveri The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity Administrative Sciences metropolitan governance decentralization capacity governance structures control |
author_facet |
Helena Tolkki Arto Haveri |
author_sort |
Helena Tolkki |
title |
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity |
title_short |
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity |
title_full |
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity |
title_fullStr |
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Dynamics between State Control and Metropolitan Governance Capacity |
title_sort |
dynamics between state control and metropolitan governance capacity |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Administrative Sciences |
issn |
2076-3387 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Due to the national importance of metropolitan areas, central governments seek to make them as attractive and competitive as possible. In many cases, this is done through state control over metropolitan areas and their governance arrangements. This article examines the relationship between state control and metropolitan governance capacity based on a comparative case study of four metropolitan areas: Auckland, Dublin, Montreal and Oslo. These areas represent different models of metropolitan governance, as well as different forms of state control. We studied state control by focusing on political and administrative decentralization: how independently can the metropolitan government make decisions and perform its tasks? The conclusion is that the different dimensions of decentralization are connected to capacity, but not straightforwardly. This study indicates that state involvement through different forms of control can increase metropolitan governance capacity, but only if it is combined with mandate and supportive policy actions. |
topic |
metropolitan governance decentralization capacity governance structures control |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/26 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT helenatolkki thedynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity AT artohaveri thedynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity AT helenatolkki dynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity AT artohaveri dynamicsbetweenstatecontrolandmetropolitangovernancecapacity |
_version_ |
1724471727476441088 |