The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Purpose To examine the psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to clarify psychosocial predictors of better or worse mental health. Methods 92 women from Canada and the United States (ages 20–45 years) whose fertility treatments had been cance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer L. Gordon, Ashley A. Balsom, Stephan Doering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500693/?tool=EBI
id doaj-de382ed0ca994af89a1de775af79173d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de382ed0ca994af89a1de775af79173d2020-11-25T03:58:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemicJennifer L. GordonAshley A. BalsomStephan DoeringPurpose To examine the psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to clarify psychosocial predictors of better or worse mental health. Methods 92 women from Canada and the United States (ages 20–45 years) whose fertility treatments had been cancelled were recruited via social media. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms, perceived mental health impact, and change in quality of life related to treatment suspensions. Potential predictors of psychological outcomes were also examined, including several personality traits, aspects of social support, illness cognitions, and coping strategies. Results 52% of respondents endorsed clinical levels of depressive symptoms. On a 7-point scale, participants endorsed a significant decline in overall quality of life (M(SD) = -1.3(1.3), p < .0001) as well as a significant decline in mental health related to treatment suspensions on a scale from -5 to +5 (M(SD) = -2.1(2.1), p < .001). Several psychosocial variables were found to positively influence these outcomes: lower levels of defensive pessimism (r = -.25, p < .05), greater infertility acceptance (r = .51, p < .0001), better quality social support (r = .31, p < .01), more social support seeking (r = .35, p < .001) and less avoidance of infertility reminders (r = -.23, p = .029). Conclusion Fertility treatment suspensions have had a considerable negative impact on women’s mental health and quality of life. However, these findings point to several protective psychosocial factors that can be fostered in the future to help women cope.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500693/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer L. Gordon
Ashley A. Balsom
Stephan Doering
spellingShingle Jennifer L. Gordon
Ashley A. Balsom
Stephan Doering
The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jennifer L. Gordon
Ashley A. Balsom
Stephan Doering
author_sort Jennifer L. Gordon
title The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed The psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions during the covid-19 pandemic
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose To examine the psychological impact of fertility treatment suspensions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to clarify psychosocial predictors of better or worse mental health. Methods 92 women from Canada and the United States (ages 20–45 years) whose fertility treatments had been cancelled were recruited via social media. Participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms, perceived mental health impact, and change in quality of life related to treatment suspensions. Potential predictors of psychological outcomes were also examined, including several personality traits, aspects of social support, illness cognitions, and coping strategies. Results 52% of respondents endorsed clinical levels of depressive symptoms. On a 7-point scale, participants endorsed a significant decline in overall quality of life (M(SD) = -1.3(1.3), p < .0001) as well as a significant decline in mental health related to treatment suspensions on a scale from -5 to +5 (M(SD) = -2.1(2.1), p < .001). Several psychosocial variables were found to positively influence these outcomes: lower levels of defensive pessimism (r = -.25, p < .05), greater infertility acceptance (r = .51, p < .0001), better quality social support (r = .31, p < .01), more social support seeking (r = .35, p < .001) and less avoidance of infertility reminders (r = -.23, p = .029). Conclusion Fertility treatment suspensions have had a considerable negative impact on women’s mental health and quality of life. However, these findings point to several protective psychosocial factors that can be fostered in the future to help women cope.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7500693/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferlgordon thepsychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ashleyabalsom thepsychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT stephandoering thepsychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT jenniferlgordon psychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT ashleyabalsom psychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT stephandoering psychologicalimpactoffertilitytreatmentsuspensionsduringthecovid19pandemic
_version_ 1724458538954129408