Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect mode...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/full |
id |
doaj-de2d8375fcea417fa961c352fec09539 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David Hercher David Hercher Markus Kerbl Markus Kerbl Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Johannes Heinzel Johannes Heinzel László Gal Michaela Stainer Michaela Stainer Robert Schmidhammer Robert Schmidhammer Thomas Hausner Thomas Hausner Heinz Redl Heinz Redl Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Ara Hacobian Ara Hacobian |
spellingShingle |
David Hercher David Hercher Markus Kerbl Markus Kerbl Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Johannes Heinzel Johannes Heinzel László Gal Michaela Stainer Michaela Stainer Robert Schmidhammer Robert Schmidhammer Thomas Hausner Thomas Hausner Heinz Redl Heinz Redl Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Ara Hacobian Ara Hacobian Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience femoral nerve Schwann cell phenotype gene expression neurotrophic factor cell adhesion molecule |
author_facet |
David Hercher David Hercher Markus Kerbl Markus Kerbl Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Christina M. A. P. Schuh Johannes Heinzel Johannes Heinzel László Gal Michaela Stainer Michaela Stainer Robert Schmidhammer Robert Schmidhammer Thomas Hausner Thomas Hausner Heinz Redl Heinz Redl Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Antal Nógrádi Ara Hacobian Ara Hacobian |
author_sort |
David Hercher |
title |
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat |
title_short |
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat |
title_full |
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat |
title_fullStr |
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat |
title_sort |
spatiotemporal differences in gene expression between motor and sensory autografts and their effect on femoral nerve regeneration in the rat |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-5102 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft. |
topic |
femoral nerve Schwann cell phenotype gene expression neurotrophic factor cell adhesion molecule |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidhercher spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT davidhercher spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT markuskerbl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT markuskerbl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT johannesheinzel spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT johannesheinzel spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT laszlogal spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT michaelastainer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT michaelastainer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT robertschmidhammer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT robertschmidhammer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT thomashausner spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT thomashausner spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT heinzredl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT heinzredl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT arahacobian spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat AT arahacobian spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat |
_version_ |
1725302276096000000 |
spelling |
doaj-de2d8375fcea417fa961c352fec095392020-11-25T00:37:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience1662-51022019-05-011310.3389/fncel.2019.00182452439Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the RatDavid Hercher0David Hercher1Markus Kerbl2Markus Kerbl3Christina M. A. P. Schuh4Christina M. A. P. Schuh5Christina M. A. P. Schuh6Johannes Heinzel7Johannes Heinzel8László Gal9Michaela Stainer10Michaela Stainer11Robert Schmidhammer12Robert Schmidhammer13Thomas Hausner14Thomas Hausner15Heinz Redl16Heinz Redl17Antal Nógrádi18Antal Nógrádi19Antal Nógrádi20Ara Hacobian21Ara Hacobian22Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaCentro de Medicina Regenerativa, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, ChileLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaTo improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/fullfemoral nerveSchwann cellphenotypegene expressionneurotrophic factorcell adhesion molecule |