Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Hercher, Markus Kerbl, Christina M. A. P. Schuh, Johannes Heinzel, László Gal, Michaela Stainer, Robert Schmidhammer, Thomas Hausner, Heinz Redl, Antal Nógrádi, Ara Hacobian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/full
id doaj-de2d8375fcea417fa961c352fec09539
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Hercher
David Hercher
Markus Kerbl
Markus Kerbl
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Johannes Heinzel
Johannes Heinzel
László Gal
Michaela Stainer
Michaela Stainer
Robert Schmidhammer
Robert Schmidhammer
Thomas Hausner
Thomas Hausner
Heinz Redl
Heinz Redl
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Ara Hacobian
Ara Hacobian
spellingShingle David Hercher
David Hercher
Markus Kerbl
Markus Kerbl
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Johannes Heinzel
Johannes Heinzel
László Gal
Michaela Stainer
Michaela Stainer
Robert Schmidhammer
Robert Schmidhammer
Thomas Hausner
Thomas Hausner
Heinz Redl
Heinz Redl
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Ara Hacobian
Ara Hacobian
Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
femoral nerve
Schwann cell
phenotype
gene expression
neurotrophic factor
cell adhesion molecule
author_facet David Hercher
David Hercher
Markus Kerbl
Markus Kerbl
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Christina M. A. P. Schuh
Johannes Heinzel
Johannes Heinzel
László Gal
Michaela Stainer
Michaela Stainer
Robert Schmidhammer
Robert Schmidhammer
Thomas Hausner
Thomas Hausner
Heinz Redl
Heinz Redl
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Antal Nógrádi
Ara Hacobian
Ara Hacobian
author_sort David Hercher
title Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_short Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_full Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
title_sort spatiotemporal differences in gene expression between motor and sensory autografts and their effect on femoral nerve regeneration in the rat
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
issn 1662-5102
publishDate 2019-05-01
description To improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft.
topic femoral nerve
Schwann cell
phenotype
gene expression
neurotrophic factor
cell adhesion molecule
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidhercher spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT davidhercher spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT markuskerbl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT markuskerbl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT christinamapschuh spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT johannesheinzel spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT johannesheinzel spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT laszlogal spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT michaelastainer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT michaelastainer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT robertschmidhammer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT robertschmidhammer spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT thomashausner spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT thomashausner spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT heinzredl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT heinzredl spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT antalnogradi spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT arahacobian spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
AT arahacobian spatiotemporaldifferencesingeneexpressionbetweenmotorandsensoryautograftsandtheireffectonfemoralnerveregenerationintherat
_version_ 1725302276096000000
spelling doaj-de2d8375fcea417fa961c352fec095392020-11-25T00:37:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience1662-51022019-05-011310.3389/fncel.2019.00182452439Spatiotemporal Differences in Gene Expression Between Motor and Sensory Autografts and Their Effect on Femoral Nerve Regeneration in the RatDavid Hercher0David Hercher1Markus Kerbl2Markus Kerbl3Christina M. A. P. Schuh4Christina M. A. P. Schuh5Christina M. A. P. Schuh6Johannes Heinzel7Johannes Heinzel8László Gal9Michaela Stainer10Michaela Stainer11Robert Schmidhammer12Robert Schmidhammer13Thomas Hausner14Thomas Hausner15Heinz Redl16Heinz Redl17Antal Nógrádi18Antal Nógrádi19Antal Nógrádi20Ara Hacobian21Ara Hacobian22Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaCentro de Medicina Regenerativa, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, ChileLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, University of Szeged, Szeged, HungaryLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, AustriaTo improve the outcome after autologous nerve grafting in the clinic, it is important to understand the limiting variables such as distinct phenotypes of motor and sensory Schwann cells. This study investigated the properties of phenotypically different autografts in a 6 mm femoral nerve defect model in the rat, where the respective femoral branches distally of the inguinal bifurcation served as homotopic, or heterotopic autografts. Axonal regeneration and target reinnervation was analyzed by gait analysis, electrophysiology, and wet muscle mass analysis. We evaluated regeneration-associated gene expression between 5 days and 10 weeks after repair, in the autografts as well as the proximal, and distal segments of the femoral nerve using qRT-PCR. Furthermore we investigated expression patterns of phenotypically pure ventral and dorsal roots. We identified highly significant differences in gene expression of a variety of regeneration-associated genes along the central – peripheral axis in healthy femoral nerves. Phenotypically mismatched grafting resulted in altered spatiotemporal expression of neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF receptor GFRα1, cell adhesion molecules Cadm3, Cadm4, L1CAM, and proliferation associated Ki67. Although significantly higher quadriceps muscle mass following homotopic nerve grafting was measured, we did not observe differences in gait analysis, and electrophysiological parameters between treatment paradigms. Our study provides evidence for phenotypic commitment of autologous nerve grafts after injury and gives a conclusive overview of temporal expression of several important regeneration-associated genes after repair with sensory or motor graft.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncel.2019.00182/fullfemoral nerveSchwann cellphenotypegene expressionneurotrophic factorcell adhesion molecule