Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas

An important limitation of Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is the inherent uncertainty in estimations of future welfare effects. In this paper, we argue that consideration of the ‘pricequality’ dilemma and the ‘communication’ dilemma is useful to explain and improve the handling of uncertainty in CBA. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niek Mouter, Marc Holleman, Simeon Calvert, Jan Anne Annema
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft Open 2015-06-01
Series:European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3082
id doaj-de25f8d01bc04837ae84cba0ac05bbf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de25f8d01bc04837ae84cba0ac05bbf22021-07-26T08:41:27ZengTU Delft OpenEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412015-06-0115310.18757/ejtir.2015.15.3.30822695Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmasNiek Mouter0Marc Holleman1Simeon Calvert2Jan Anne Annema3Delft University of TechnologyDelft University of TechnologyDelft University of TechnologyDelft University of TechnologyAn important limitation of Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is the inherent uncertainty in estimations of future welfare effects. In this paper, we argue that consideration of the ‘pricequality’ dilemma and the ‘communication’ dilemma is useful to explain and improve the handling of uncertainty in CBA. The ‘price-quality’ dilemma refers to the trade-off between the quality of welfare effect estimations and the costs of providing these estimations. Instruments to produce good quality effect estimates (including uncertainties) can be expensive both in monetary terms and time. We discuss the application of probabilistic traffic models as a promising example of how the ‘price-quality’ dilemma can be solved. The ‘communication’ dilemma refers to the observation that both a poor communication and a too prominent communication of uncertainties can cause problems for decision-makers. We argue that cognitive psychological theory provides useful perspectives to solve this dilemma, by providing a psychological framework which might help to explain why different types of people process CBA information differently. The results of this research may enhance first insights into the questions how the two dilemmas can be solved.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3082
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Niek Mouter
Marc Holleman
Simeon Calvert
Jan Anne Annema
spellingShingle Niek Mouter
Marc Holleman
Simeon Calvert
Jan Anne Annema
Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
author_facet Niek Mouter
Marc Holleman
Simeon Calvert
Jan Anne Annema
author_sort Niek Mouter
title Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
title_short Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
title_full Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
title_fullStr Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
title_sort towards improved handling of uncertainty in cost-benefit analysis: addressing the ‘price-quality’ and ‘communication’ dilemmas
publisher TU Delft Open
series European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
issn 1567-7141
publishDate 2015-06-01
description An important limitation of Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is the inherent uncertainty in estimations of future welfare effects. In this paper, we argue that consideration of the ‘pricequality’ dilemma and the ‘communication’ dilemma is useful to explain and improve the handling of uncertainty in CBA. The ‘price-quality’ dilemma refers to the trade-off between the quality of welfare effect estimations and the costs of providing these estimations. Instruments to produce good quality effect estimates (including uncertainties) can be expensive both in monetary terms and time. We discuss the application of probabilistic traffic models as a promising example of how the ‘price-quality’ dilemma can be solved. The ‘communication’ dilemma refers to the observation that both a poor communication and a too prominent communication of uncertainties can cause problems for decision-makers. We argue that cognitive psychological theory provides useful perspectives to solve this dilemma, by providing a psychological framework which might help to explain why different types of people process CBA information differently. The results of this research may enhance first insights into the questions how the two dilemmas can be solved.
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/3082
work_keys_str_mv AT niekmouter towardsimprovedhandlingofuncertaintyincostbenefitanalysisaddressingthepricequalityandcommunicationdilemmas
AT marcholleman towardsimprovedhandlingofuncertaintyincostbenefitanalysisaddressingthepricequalityandcommunicationdilemmas
AT simeoncalvert towardsimprovedhandlingofuncertaintyincostbenefitanalysisaddressingthepricequalityandcommunicationdilemmas
AT jananneannema towardsimprovedhandlingofuncertaintyincostbenefitanalysisaddressingthepricequalityandcommunicationdilemmas
_version_ 1721282147937943552