Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research

Abstract Mixed methods research (MMR) has found an increased interest in the field of health outcomes research. Consideration for both qualitative and quantitative perspectives has become key to contextualising patient experiences in a clinically meaningful measurement framework. The purpose of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoine Regnault, Tom Willgoss, Skye Barbic, On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-04-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
id doaj-de2445a7f75a4e01b3e9a451c74620e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de2445a7f75a4e01b3e9a451c74620e62020-11-24T20:44:51ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202018-04-01211410.1186/s41687-018-0043-8Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes researchAntoine Regnault0Tom Willgoss1Skye Barbic2On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG)Modus OutcomesRoche Products Ltd.The University of British ColumbiaAbstract Mixed methods research (MMR) has found an increased interest in the field of health outcomes research. Consideration for both qualitative and quantitative perspectives has become key to contextualising patient experiences in a clinically meaningful measurement framework. The purpose of this paper is to outline a process for incorporating MMR in health outcomes research to guide stakeholders in their understanding of the essence of mixed methods inquiry. In addition, this paper will outline the benefits and challenges of MMR and describe the types of support needed for designing and conducting robust MMR measurement studies. MMR involves the application of a well-defined and pre-specified research design that articulates purposely and prospectively, qualitative and quantitative components to generate an integrated set of evidence addressing a single research question. Various methodological design options are possible depending on the research question. MMR designs allow a research question to be studied thoroughly from different perspectives. When applied, it allows the strengths of one approach to complement the restrictions of another. Among other applications, MMR can be used to enhance the creation of conceptual models and development of new instruments, to interpret the meaningfulness of outcomes in a clinical study from the patient perspective, and inform health care policy. Robust MMR requires research teams with experience in both qualitative and quantitative research. Moreover, a thorough understanding of the underlying principles of MMR is recommended at the point of study conception all the way through to implementation and knowledge dissemination. The framework outlined in this paper is designed to encourage health outcomes researchers to apply MMR to their research and to facilitate innovative, patient-centred methodological solutions to address the complex challenges of the field.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antoine Regnault
Tom Willgoss
Skye Barbic
On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG)
spellingShingle Antoine Regnault
Tom Willgoss
Skye Barbic
On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG)
Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
author_facet Antoine Regnault
Tom Willgoss
Skye Barbic
On behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Mixed Methods Special Interest Group (SIG)
author_sort Antoine Regnault
title Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
title_short Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
title_full Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
title_fullStr Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
title_full_unstemmed Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
title_sort towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
issn 2509-8020
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Mixed methods research (MMR) has found an increased interest in the field of health outcomes research. Consideration for both qualitative and quantitative perspectives has become key to contextualising patient experiences in a clinically meaningful measurement framework. The purpose of this paper is to outline a process for incorporating MMR in health outcomes research to guide stakeholders in their understanding of the essence of mixed methods inquiry. In addition, this paper will outline the benefits and challenges of MMR and describe the types of support needed for designing and conducting robust MMR measurement studies. MMR involves the application of a well-defined and pre-specified research design that articulates purposely and prospectively, qualitative and quantitative components to generate an integrated set of evidence addressing a single research question. Various methodological design options are possible depending on the research question. MMR designs allow a research question to be studied thoroughly from different perspectives. When applied, it allows the strengths of one approach to complement the restrictions of another. Among other applications, MMR can be used to enhance the creation of conceptual models and development of new instruments, to interpret the meaningfulness of outcomes in a clinical study from the patient perspective, and inform health care policy. Robust MMR requires research teams with experience in both qualitative and quantitative research. Moreover, a thorough understanding of the underlying principles of MMR is recommended at the point of study conception all the way through to implementation and knowledge dissemination. The framework outlined in this paper is designed to encourage health outcomes researchers to apply MMR to their research and to facilitate innovative, patient-centred methodological solutions to address the complex challenges of the field.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
work_keys_str_mv AT antoineregnault towardstheuseofmixedmethodsinquiryasbestpracticeinhealthoutcomesresearch
AT tomwillgoss towardstheuseofmixedmethodsinquiryasbestpracticeinhealthoutcomesresearch
AT skyebarbic towardstheuseofmixedmethodsinquiryasbestpracticeinhealthoutcomesresearch
AT onbehalfoftheinternationalsocietyforqualityofliferesearchisoqolmixedmethodsspecialinterestgroupsig towardstheuseofmixedmethodsinquiryasbestpracticeinhealthoutcomesresearch
_version_ 1716816413248716800