Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model

Background and study aims Cholangiopancreatoscopy is utilized for diagnosis and therapy of pancreaticobiliary disorders. a fully-disposable, digital, single-operator cholangioscope (DSOC) was developed with high image resolution and wide field-of-view. This bench study compared the new DSOC to the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raj J. Shah, Horst Neuhaus, Mansour Parsi, D. Nageshwar Reddy, Douglas K. Pleskow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-07-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0584-6458
id doaj-de1d8790b8434b8fbc4a9b383a7b7c71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de1d8790b8434b8fbc4a9b383a7b7c712020-11-25T03:51:35ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-07-010607E851E85610.1055/a-0584-6458Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench modelRaj J. Shah0Horst Neuhaus1Mansour Parsi2D. Nageshwar Reddy3Douglas K. Pleskow4Gastroenterology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United StatesGastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, GermanyGastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United StatesGastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, IndiaGastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United StatesBackground and study aims Cholangiopancreatoscopy is utilized for diagnosis and therapy of pancreaticobiliary disorders. a fully-disposable, digital, single-operator cholangioscope (DSOC) was developed with high image resolution and wide field-of-view. This bench study compared the new DSOC to the previous semi-disposable, fiber-optic cholangioscope (FSOC) prior to the clinical availability of the DSOC system. Methods Five experts performed one practice run followed by randomized runs comparing DSOC to FSOC in a biliary tract model consisting of three fixed left-intrahepatic tracts (LIHD), and variable common bile duct (CBD) and right-intrahepatic tracts (RIHD) with seven total lesions in multiple configurations. Timed runs aimed to visualize and target each lesion using miniature biopsy forceps. Definitions: visual success, visualizing targets; targeting success, touching target with forceps; complete run, touching seven targets within 20 minutes. Image quality, ease-of-use, and time to completion were recorded. Results Thirty-seven evaluable runs (20 DSOC, 17 FSOC) were completed. DSOC was superior to FSOC in Visual (99 % vs. 67 %, P < 0.001) and targeting success (6.6 vs. 4.5, P = 0.009), proportion of complete runs (13 /20 vs. 0 /17, P < 0.001) and time of run (10.1 min vs. 15.4 min, P < 0.001). For fixed LIHD, DSOC achieved higher targeting success compared to FSOC (2.6 vs. 1.1, P < 0.001) with no difference in RIHD and CBD targets (4.0 vs. 3.4, P = 0.39). Investigators reported superior image quality and ease-of-use with DSOC. Conclusions In this model, DSOC performed superiorly to FSOC in image quality, visualization, and maneuverability. The model could potentially be utilized for training endoscopists less experienced with cholangiopancreatoscopy.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0584-6458
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raj J. Shah
Horst Neuhaus
Mansour Parsi
D. Nageshwar Reddy
Douglas K. Pleskow
spellingShingle Raj J. Shah
Horst Neuhaus
Mansour Parsi
D. Nageshwar Reddy
Douglas K. Pleskow
Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Raj J. Shah
Horst Neuhaus
Mansour Parsi
D. Nageshwar Reddy
Douglas K. Pleskow
author_sort Raj J. Shah
title Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
title_short Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
title_full Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
title_fullStr Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
title_full_unstemmed Randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
title_sort randomized study of digital single-operator cholangioscope compared to fiberoptic single-operator cholangioscope in a novel cholangioscopy bench model
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background and study aims Cholangiopancreatoscopy is utilized for diagnosis and therapy of pancreaticobiliary disorders. a fully-disposable, digital, single-operator cholangioscope (DSOC) was developed with high image resolution and wide field-of-view. This bench study compared the new DSOC to the previous semi-disposable, fiber-optic cholangioscope (FSOC) prior to the clinical availability of the DSOC system. Methods Five experts performed one practice run followed by randomized runs comparing DSOC to FSOC in a biliary tract model consisting of three fixed left-intrahepatic tracts (LIHD), and variable common bile duct (CBD) and right-intrahepatic tracts (RIHD) with seven total lesions in multiple configurations. Timed runs aimed to visualize and target each lesion using miniature biopsy forceps. Definitions: visual success, visualizing targets; targeting success, touching target with forceps; complete run, touching seven targets within 20 minutes. Image quality, ease-of-use, and time to completion were recorded. Results Thirty-seven evaluable runs (20 DSOC, 17 FSOC) were completed. DSOC was superior to FSOC in Visual (99 % vs. 67 %, P < 0.001) and targeting success (6.6 vs. 4.5, P = 0.009), proportion of complete runs (13 /20 vs. 0 /17, P < 0.001) and time of run (10.1 min vs. 15.4 min, P < 0.001). For fixed LIHD, DSOC achieved higher targeting success compared to FSOC (2.6 vs. 1.1, P < 0.001) with no difference in RIHD and CBD targets (4.0 vs. 3.4, P = 0.39). Investigators reported superior image quality and ease-of-use with DSOC. Conclusions In this model, DSOC performed superiorly to FSOC in image quality, visualization, and maneuverability. The model could potentially be utilized for training endoscopists less experienced with cholangiopancreatoscopy.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0584-6458
work_keys_str_mv AT rajjshah randomizedstudyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopecomparedtofiberopticsingleoperatorcholangioscopeinanovelcholangioscopybenchmodel
AT horstneuhaus randomizedstudyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopecomparedtofiberopticsingleoperatorcholangioscopeinanovelcholangioscopybenchmodel
AT mansourparsi randomizedstudyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopecomparedtofiberopticsingleoperatorcholangioscopeinanovelcholangioscopybenchmodel
AT dnageshwarreddy randomizedstudyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopecomparedtofiberopticsingleoperatorcholangioscopeinanovelcholangioscopybenchmodel
AT douglaskpleskow randomizedstudyofdigitalsingleoperatorcholangioscopecomparedtofiberopticsingleoperatorcholangioscopeinanovelcholangioscopybenchmodel
_version_ 1724486731746508800