A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anstett Marie-Charlotte, Baker William J, Sannier Julie, Nadot Sophie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-07-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/2/145
id doaj-de1c07669dc44ba2a9475a2f3ce12ae3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de1c07669dc44ba2a9475a2f3ce12ae32020-11-25T02:16:15ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002009-07-012114510.1186/1756-0500-2-145A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocotsAnstett Marie-CharlotteBaker William JSannier JulieNadot Sophie<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pollination while sculptured pollen grains are associated with biotic pollination. We tested the statistical significance of an association between pollen ornamentation and pollination system in two families of the monocotyledons, the Araceae and the Arecaceae, taking into account the phylogenetic framework.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>Character optimization was carried out with the Maximum Parsimony method and two different methods of comparative analysis were used: the Concentrated-Change test and the Discrete method. The ancestral ornamentation in Araceae is foveolate/reticulate. It is probably the same in Arecaceae. The ancestral flowers of Araceae were pollinated by beetles while ancestral pollination in Arecaceae is equivocal. A correlation between ornamentation type and pollination was highlighted in Araceae although the results slightly differ depending on the method and the options chosen for performing the analyses. No correlation was found in palms.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this study, we show that the relationships between the ornamentation type and the pollination system depend on the family and hence vary among taxonomic groups. We also show that the method chosen may strongly influence the results.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/2/145
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anstett Marie-Charlotte
Baker William J
Sannier Julie
Nadot Sophie
spellingShingle Anstett Marie-Charlotte
Baker William J
Sannier Julie
Nadot Sophie
A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
BMC Research Notes
author_facet Anstett Marie-Charlotte
Baker William J
Sannier Julie
Nadot Sophie
author_sort Anstett Marie-Charlotte
title A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
title_short A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
title_full A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the Araceae and the Arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
title_sort comparative analysis of pollinator type and pollen ornamentation in the araceae and the arecaceae, two unrelated families of the monocots
publisher BMC
series BMC Research Notes
issn 1756-0500
publishDate 2009-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The high diversity of ornamentation type in pollen grains of angiosperms has often been suggested to be linked to diversity in pollination systems. It is commonly stated that smooth pollen grains are associated with wind or water pollination while sculptured pollen grains are associated with biotic pollination. We tested the statistical significance of an association between pollen ornamentation and pollination system in two families of the monocotyledons, the Araceae and the Arecaceae, taking into account the phylogenetic framework.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>Character optimization was carried out with the Maximum Parsimony method and two different methods of comparative analysis were used: the Concentrated-Change test and the Discrete method. The ancestral ornamentation in Araceae is foveolate/reticulate. It is probably the same in Arecaceae. The ancestral flowers of Araceae were pollinated by beetles while ancestral pollination in Arecaceae is equivocal. A correlation between ornamentation type and pollination was highlighted in Araceae although the results slightly differ depending on the method and the options chosen for performing the analyses. No correlation was found in palms.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this study, we show that the relationships between the ornamentation type and the pollination system depend on the family and hence vary among taxonomic groups. We also show that the method chosen may strongly influence the results.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/2/145
work_keys_str_mv AT anstettmariecharlotte acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT bakerwilliamj acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT sannierjulie acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT nadotsophie acomparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT anstettmariecharlotte comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT bakerwilliamj comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT sannierjulie comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
AT nadotsophie comparativeanalysisofpollinatortypeandpollenornamentationinthearaceaeandthearecaceaetwounrelatedfamiliesofthemonocots
_version_ 1724891679267225600