Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system

This study was conducted to assess Soil Quality Indicators (SQIs) in some cultivated soils in North Delta, Egypt. Two methodologies were implemented (Simple additive SQI1 and Weighted additive SQI2) to assess Soil Quality (SQ) status. SQ was determined qualitatively and quantitatively based on field...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman, A. Shalaby, E.S. Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-08-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982317301059
id doaj-de0231845fd4497192706b34dad9a153
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de0231845fd4497192706b34dad9a1532020-11-25T02:03:26ZengElsevierEgyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences1110-98232019-08-01222127136Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information systemMohamed A.E. AbdelRahman0A. Shalaby1E.S. Mohamed2Corresponding author.; National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, EgyptNational Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, EgyptNational Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, EgyptThis study was conducted to assess Soil Quality Indicators (SQIs) in some cultivated soils in North Delta, Egypt. Two methodologies were implemented (Simple additive SQI1 and Weighted additive SQI2) to assess Soil Quality (SQ) status. SQ was determined qualitatively and quantitatively based on field study and laboratory analysis. In addition the results of both methods were evaluated statistically. Soil Quality Indices (SQI) were examined based on vertical and horizontal soil properties. Twenty potential physiochemical SQIs of sixty soil profiles were assessed. The physiochemical parameters considered in this study were given SQ rate based on each parameter standard rate. The results demonstrated that the assessment of soil Quality based on both methods are similar with significant correlation in the case of well distributed soil samples. SQI2 Outperform SQI1 in comprising all indicators, while SQI1 is timely appreciated economically preferable. The differences in results of SQI1 and SQI2 are mainly due to the numbers of SQIs considered in the calculations and the variations of soil properties through the soil profile. The results indicated that north part of the area characterized by low SQ while the south portion is high SQ whilst the eastern part is moderate. However the low value of SQ in north Nile Delta is mainly associated with the levels of soil salinity, soil compaction and waterlogging. Keywords: Geostatistics, GIS, Model builder, Nile Delta, Soil qualityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982317301059
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman
A. Shalaby
E.S. Mohamed
spellingShingle Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman
A. Shalaby
E.S. Mohamed
Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
author_facet Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman
A. Shalaby
E.S. Mohamed
author_sort Mohamed A.E. AbdelRahman
title Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
title_short Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
title_full Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
title_fullStr Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
title_sort comparison of two soil quality indices using two methods based on geographic information system
publisher Elsevier
series Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
issn 1110-9823
publishDate 2019-08-01
description This study was conducted to assess Soil Quality Indicators (SQIs) in some cultivated soils in North Delta, Egypt. Two methodologies were implemented (Simple additive SQI1 and Weighted additive SQI2) to assess Soil Quality (SQ) status. SQ was determined qualitatively and quantitatively based on field study and laboratory analysis. In addition the results of both methods were evaluated statistically. Soil Quality Indices (SQI) were examined based on vertical and horizontal soil properties. Twenty potential physiochemical SQIs of sixty soil profiles were assessed. The physiochemical parameters considered in this study were given SQ rate based on each parameter standard rate. The results demonstrated that the assessment of soil Quality based on both methods are similar with significant correlation in the case of well distributed soil samples. SQI2 Outperform SQI1 in comprising all indicators, while SQI1 is timely appreciated economically preferable. The differences in results of SQI1 and SQI2 are mainly due to the numbers of SQIs considered in the calculations and the variations of soil properties through the soil profile. The results indicated that north part of the area characterized by low SQ while the south portion is high SQ whilst the eastern part is moderate. However the low value of SQ in north Nile Delta is mainly associated with the levels of soil salinity, soil compaction and waterlogging. Keywords: Geostatistics, GIS, Model builder, Nile Delta, Soil quality
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982317301059
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedaeabdelrahman comparisonoftwosoilqualityindicesusingtwomethodsbasedongeographicinformationsystem
AT ashalaby comparisonoftwosoilqualityindicesusingtwomethodsbasedongeographicinformationsystem
AT esmohamed comparisonoftwosoilqualityindicesusingtwomethodsbasedongeographicinformationsystem
_version_ 1724948308060798976