Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds

Abstract Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Coburn, M. Scott Wells, Craig C. Sheaffer, Roger Ruan, Deborah A. Samac
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184
id doaj-ddf82c5fe1e34afab6c1c2463c718d1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddf82c5fe1e34afab6c1c2463c718d1d2021-06-30T05:10:35ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962021-01-0142n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20184Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feedsJessica Coburn0M. Scott Wells1Craig C. Sheaffer2Roger Ruan3Deborah A. Samac4Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics Univ. of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics Univ. of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics Univ. of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 USADep. of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering Univ. of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 USAUSDA‐ARS Plant Science Research Unit St. Paul MN 55108 USAAbstract Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica Coburn
M. Scott Wells
Craig C. Sheaffer
Roger Ruan
Deborah A. Samac
spellingShingle Jessica Coburn
M. Scott Wells
Craig C. Sheaffer
Roger Ruan
Deborah A. Samac
Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
author_facet Jessica Coburn
M. Scott Wells
Craig C. Sheaffer
Roger Ruan
Deborah A. Samac
author_sort Jessica Coburn
title Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_short Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_fullStr Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
title_sort comparison of plant feedstocks and methods to recover leaf proteins from wet fractionation of alfalfa for potential use in aquaculture, poultry, and livestock feeds
publisher Wiley
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
issn 2639-6696
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Alternative plant‐based protein sources are needed for supplementing or replacing fishmeal in formulated animal feeds. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial legume, is grown worldwide as a high‐protein forage crop used primarily for dairy and beef cattle feeds. However, its utility as a protein source for feeding other farmed animals has great potential. Wet fractionation can provide several products that increase the value of the crop. The amount of alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) recovered from a fresh press filtrate was measured from several feedstocks: herbage of a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa, genetically modified reduced‐lignin alfalfa, and conventional alfalfa as well as from leaves of the biomass type fractionated at harvest. Additionally, five methods for APC recovery were compared. Approximately 854 kg of APC, 7,109 kg of press residue suitable as low quality animal feed, and 4.5 Tg of dry hay could be produced annually from a hectare of biomass‐type alfalfa. The amounts of APC recovered from a reduced‐lignin alfalfa and a conventional cultivar were similar. Acid‐based precipitation methods resulted in the largest recovery of APC, whereas heating produced the highest concentration of protein in the concentrate and highest concentration of methionine, lysine, and threonine. The percentage of fatty acids and sugars in the concentrate varied significantly by precipitation method. All methods resulted in low amounts of fiber in the concentrate. Our results indicate that a nonlodging biomass‐type alfalfa can produce high yields of APC and co‐products with fewer harvests than a conventional cultivar, which reduces costs and promotes crop productivity.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20184
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicacoburn comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
AT mscottwells comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
AT craigcsheaffer comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
AT rogerruan comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
AT deborahasamac comparisonofplantfeedstocksandmethodstorecoverleafproteinsfromwetfractionationofalfalfaforpotentialuseinaquaculturepoultryandlivestockfeeds
_version_ 1721353544154480640