Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection

Abstract Despite widespread interest in the potential adaptive value of individual differences in cognition, few studies have attempted to address the question of how variation in learning and memory impacts their performance in natural environments. Using a novel split-colony experimental design we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa J. Evans, Karen E. Smith, Nigel E. Raine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00389-0
id doaj-dde4ec276dc94c9595b40c8b2a90f3fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dde4ec276dc94c9595b40c8b2a90f3fd2020-12-08T02:02:26ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-03-017111010.1038/s41598-017-00389-0Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collectionLisa J. Evans0Karen E. Smith1Nigel E. Raine2School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of LondonSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of LondonSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of LondonAbstract Despite widespread interest in the potential adaptive value of individual differences in cognition, few studies have attempted to address the question of how variation in learning and memory impacts their performance in natural environments. Using a novel split-colony experimental design we evaluated visual learning performance of foraging naïve bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) in an ecologically relevant associative learning task under controlled laboratory conditions, before monitoring the lifetime foraging performance of the same individual bees in the field. We found appreciable variation among the 85 workers tested in both their learning and foraging performance, which was not predicted by colony membership. However, rather than finding that foragers benefited from enhanced learning performance, we found that fast and slow learners collected food at comparable rates and completed a similar number of foraging bouts per day in the field. Furthermore, bees with better learning abilities foraged for fewer days; suggesting a cost of enhanced learning performance in the wild. As a result, slower learning individuals collected more resources for their colony over the course of their foraging career. These results demonstrate that enhanced cognitive traits are not necessarily beneficial to the foraging performance of individuals or colonies in all environments.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00389-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa J. Evans
Karen E. Smith
Nigel E. Raine
spellingShingle Lisa J. Evans
Karen E. Smith
Nigel E. Raine
Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
Scientific Reports
author_facet Lisa J. Evans
Karen E. Smith
Nigel E. Raine
author_sort Lisa J. Evans
title Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
title_short Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
title_full Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
title_fullStr Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
title_full_unstemmed Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
title_sort fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Abstract Despite widespread interest in the potential adaptive value of individual differences in cognition, few studies have attempted to address the question of how variation in learning and memory impacts their performance in natural environments. Using a novel split-colony experimental design we evaluated visual learning performance of foraging naïve bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) in an ecologically relevant associative learning task under controlled laboratory conditions, before monitoring the lifetime foraging performance of the same individual bees in the field. We found appreciable variation among the 85 workers tested in both their learning and foraging performance, which was not predicted by colony membership. However, rather than finding that foragers benefited from enhanced learning performance, we found that fast and slow learners collected food at comparable rates and completed a similar number of foraging bouts per day in the field. Furthermore, bees with better learning abilities foraged for fewer days; suggesting a cost of enhanced learning performance in the wild. As a result, slower learning individuals collected more resources for their colony over the course of their foraging career. These results demonstrate that enhanced cognitive traits are not necessarily beneficial to the foraging performance of individuals or colonies in all environments.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00389-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lisajevans fastlearninginfreeforagingbumblebeesisnegativelycorrelatedwithlifetimeresourcecollection
AT karenesmith fastlearninginfreeforagingbumblebeesisnegativelycorrelatedwithlifetimeresourcecollection
AT nigeleraine fastlearninginfreeforagingbumblebeesisnegativelycorrelatedwithlifetimeresourcecollection
_version_ 1724394256730161152