The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture

“Movement in architecture” is an organized system of various types of movements stimulated by specific architectural elements. This research was conducted through a qualitative-analytical method and empirical and bibliographical research methods with the aim to categorize different types of movement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mosleh Ahmadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Cogent Arts & Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1588090
id doaj-dde3d115c8304673b1b5ec78f36eefe9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dde3d115c8304673b1b5ec78f36eefe92021-02-09T09:19:16ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Arts & Humanities2331-19832019-01-016110.1080/23311983.2019.15880901588090The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architectureMosleh Ahmadi0Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad university“Movement in architecture” is an organized system of various types of movements stimulated by specific architectural elements. This research was conducted through a qualitative-analytical method and empirical and bibliographical research methods with the aim to categorize different types of movements based on the explorer and observer relationships with the built space and form. So far, most of the related studies have focused on a few aspects of movement. In this article, the author tries not only to address circulation in architecture and visual movements but also the physiological psychology of motion, pictorial representation, and natural factors. The physical movement of built form and space is also considered more coherently and comprehensively, along with all stimulus factors and elements. Subsequently, this research presents a taxonomy in the form of an assessment table correlating with various types of movements along with their generator factors and architectural elements. The article conceptions are justified by a comparative analogy between two bridges: Khaju and Tabiat, representing 17th century and contemporary Iranian architecture, respectively.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1588090architecturemovementformspaceiranian bridge
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mosleh Ahmadi
spellingShingle Mosleh Ahmadi
The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
Cogent Arts & Humanities
architecture
movement
form
space
iranian bridge
author_facet Mosleh Ahmadi
author_sort Mosleh Ahmadi
title The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
title_short The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
title_full The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
title_fullStr The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
title_full_unstemmed The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture
title_sort experience of movement in the built form and space: a framework for movement evaluation in architecture
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Arts & Humanities
issn 2331-1983
publishDate 2019-01-01
description “Movement in architecture” is an organized system of various types of movements stimulated by specific architectural elements. This research was conducted through a qualitative-analytical method and empirical and bibliographical research methods with the aim to categorize different types of movements based on the explorer and observer relationships with the built space and form. So far, most of the related studies have focused on a few aspects of movement. In this article, the author tries not only to address circulation in architecture and visual movements but also the physiological psychology of motion, pictorial representation, and natural factors. The physical movement of built form and space is also considered more coherently and comprehensively, along with all stimulus factors and elements. Subsequently, this research presents a taxonomy in the form of an assessment table correlating with various types of movements along with their generator factors and architectural elements. The article conceptions are justified by a comparative analogy between two bridges: Khaju and Tabiat, representing 17th century and contemporary Iranian architecture, respectively.
topic architecture
movement
form
space
iranian bridge
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1588090
work_keys_str_mv AT moslehahmadi theexperienceofmovementinthebuiltformandspaceaframeworkformovementevaluationinarchitecture
AT moslehahmadi experienceofmovementinthebuiltformandspaceaframeworkformovementevaluationinarchitecture
_version_ 1724277432257609728