Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background The aim was to investigate attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak among emergency medical services (EMS) workers in Germany. We further aimed to detect possible changes within a 5-week period and potential determinants of attitudes and stressors. Methods We co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annegret Dreher, Frank Flake, Reinhard Pietrowsky, Adrian Loerbroks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06779-5
id doaj-ddcdc400c3554f738b00ac03bdb8995e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddcdc400c3554f738b00ac03bdb8995e2021-08-22T11:10:52ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-08-0121111210.1186/s12913-021-06779-5Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional studyAnnegret Dreher0Frank Flake1Reinhard Pietrowsky2Adrian Loerbroks3Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of DuesseldorfGerman Association of Emergency Medical ServiceInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of DuesseldorfInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of DuesseldorfAbstract Background The aim was to investigate attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak among emergency medical services (EMS) workers in Germany. We further aimed to detect possible changes within a 5-week period and potential determinants of attitudes and stressors. Methods We conducted two cross-sectional studies using an online questionnaire in early April 2020 (i.e., the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Germany) and five weeks later. The study instrument comprised sociodemographic items, self-devised items on pandemic-related attitudes, stressors and work outcomes, and established instruments assessing depressive symptoms and symptoms of anxiety. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible determinants. Results Data of 1537 participants was included in the analysis (April: n = 1124, May: n = 413, 83.1% male, median age 32). Most participants agreed that their personal risk of infection was higher compared to the general population (April: 87.0% agreement, May: 78.9%). The greatest stressor was uncertainty about the pandemic’s temporal scope (82.0 and 80.9%, respectively). Most participants (69.9, 79.7%) felt sufficiently prepared for the pandemic and only few felt burdened by their financial situation (18.8, 13.3%). Agreement to all stressors decreased from April to May except related to the childcare situation. Regression analysis identified subgroups to be burdened more frequently such as older employees, those with SARS-CoV-2 cases among their colleagues, and those with lower paramedic training levels. Conclusions We identified key SARS-CoV-2-related stressors whose levels generally decreased within a 5-week period. Our results indicate that EMS workers are less affected by existential fears and rather worry about their personal infection risk.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06779-5Emergency medical services workersCOVID-19Cross-sectional studyEpidemiologyOccupational healthPsychological stress
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Annegret Dreher
Frank Flake
Reinhard Pietrowsky
Adrian Loerbroks
spellingShingle Annegret Dreher
Frank Flake
Reinhard Pietrowsky
Adrian Loerbroks
Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
BMC Health Services Research
Emergency medical services workers
COVID-19
Cross-sectional study
Epidemiology
Occupational health
Psychological stress
author_facet Annegret Dreher
Frank Flake
Reinhard Pietrowsky
Adrian Loerbroks
author_sort Annegret Dreher
title Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
title_short Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
title_full Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in Germany: a cross-sectional study
title_sort attitudes and stressors related to the sars-cov-2 pandemic among emergency medical services workers in germany: a cross-sectional study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background The aim was to investigate attitudes and stressors related to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak among emergency medical services (EMS) workers in Germany. We further aimed to detect possible changes within a 5-week period and potential determinants of attitudes and stressors. Methods We conducted two cross-sectional studies using an online questionnaire in early April 2020 (i.e., the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Germany) and five weeks later. The study instrument comprised sociodemographic items, self-devised items on pandemic-related attitudes, stressors and work outcomes, and established instruments assessing depressive symptoms and symptoms of anxiety. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible determinants. Results Data of 1537 participants was included in the analysis (April: n = 1124, May: n = 413, 83.1% male, median age 32). Most participants agreed that their personal risk of infection was higher compared to the general population (April: 87.0% agreement, May: 78.9%). The greatest stressor was uncertainty about the pandemic’s temporal scope (82.0 and 80.9%, respectively). Most participants (69.9, 79.7%) felt sufficiently prepared for the pandemic and only few felt burdened by their financial situation (18.8, 13.3%). Agreement to all stressors decreased from April to May except related to the childcare situation. Regression analysis identified subgroups to be burdened more frequently such as older employees, those with SARS-CoV-2 cases among their colleagues, and those with lower paramedic training levels. Conclusions We identified key SARS-CoV-2-related stressors whose levels generally decreased within a 5-week period. Our results indicate that EMS workers are less affected by existential fears and rather worry about their personal infection risk.
topic Emergency medical services workers
COVID-19
Cross-sectional study
Epidemiology
Occupational health
Psychological stress
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06779-5
work_keys_str_mv AT annegretdreher attitudesandstressorsrelatedtothesarscov2pandemicamongemergencymedicalservicesworkersingermanyacrosssectionalstudy
AT frankflake attitudesandstressorsrelatedtothesarscov2pandemicamongemergencymedicalservicesworkersingermanyacrosssectionalstudy
AT reinhardpietrowsky attitudesandstressorsrelatedtothesarscov2pandemicamongemergencymedicalservicesworkersingermanyacrosssectionalstudy
AT adrianloerbroks attitudesandstressorsrelatedtothesarscov2pandemicamongemergencymedicalservicesworkersingermanyacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1721200139609047040