Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model

Richard Mutell, Jaime L Rubin, T Christopher Bond, Tracy Mayne DaVita Clinical Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA Background: Ferric citrate (FC) is a phosphate binder in development for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In clinical trials, FC improved p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mutell R, Rubin JL, Bond TC, Mayne T
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2013-04-01
Series:International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/reduced-use-of-erythropoiesis-stimulating-agents-and-intravenous-iron--a12911
id doaj-ddcd1d1ec32149c99fcce25432177777
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddcd1d1ec32149c99fcce254321777772020-11-24T21:59:57ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease1178-70582013-04-012013default7987Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset modelMutell RRubin JLBond TCMayne TRichard Mutell, Jaime L Rubin, T Christopher Bond, Tracy Mayne DaVita Clinical Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA Background: Ferric citrate (FC) is a phosphate binder in development for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In clinical trials, FC improved patient serum phosphorus levels and increased serum ferritin and percent transferrin saturation. Because nephrologists respond to increases in these iron measures by reducing intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) doses, the decreased use of iron and ESA associated with FC may reduce costs. Objectives: To develop a cost-offset model from a managed care perspective estimating the cost savings associated with FC use. Methods: We created a cost-offset model from the managed care payer perspective that compared the treatment costs of ESRD for patients given FC. The model considered the number of dialysis sessions per month; number of ESRD patients enrolled in the health plan; cost of ESAs, iron, and dialysis sessions; and the proportion of patients on phosphate binder therapy. The model assumed equivalent efficacy and cost neutrality between FC and other phosphate binders. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted by varying model inputs. Results: When FC was compared to other phosphate binders, the monthly cost of ESA and IV iron per 500 patients with ESRD (85% treated with phosphate binders) was reduced by 8.15% and 33.2%, respectively. When incorporated into the total cost of dialysis for patients with ESRD (dialysis, ESA, and IV iron), the decrease in the monthly cost of dialysis care was US$80,214 per 500 ESRD patients. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that a plan serving 500 dialysis patients could save between US$626,000 and US$1,106,000 annually with the use of FC. Conclusion: The use of FC in ESRD patients with hyperphosphatemia may help reduce treatment costs. Keywords: phosphate binders, hyperphosphatemia, end-stage renal disease, dialysis, hemodialysishttp://www.dovepress.com/reduced-use-of-erythropoiesis-stimulating-agents-and-intravenous-iron--a12911
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mutell R
Rubin JL
Bond TC
Mayne T
spellingShingle Mutell R
Rubin JL
Bond TC
Mayne T
Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
author_facet Mutell R
Rubin JL
Bond TC
Mayne T
author_sort Mutell R
title Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
title_short Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
title_full Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
title_fullStr Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
title_full_unstemmed Reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
title_sort reduced use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron with ferric citrate: a managed care cost-offset model
publisher Dove Medical Press
series International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
issn 1178-7058
publishDate 2013-04-01
description Richard Mutell, Jaime L Rubin, T Christopher Bond, Tracy Mayne DaVita Clinical Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA Background: Ferric citrate (FC) is a phosphate binder in development for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In clinical trials, FC improved patient serum phosphorus levels and increased serum ferritin and percent transferrin saturation. Because nephrologists respond to increases in these iron measures by reducing intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) doses, the decreased use of iron and ESA associated with FC may reduce costs. Objectives: To develop a cost-offset model from a managed care perspective estimating the cost savings associated with FC use. Methods: We created a cost-offset model from the managed care payer perspective that compared the treatment costs of ESRD for patients given FC. The model considered the number of dialysis sessions per month; number of ESRD patients enrolled in the health plan; cost of ESAs, iron, and dialysis sessions; and the proportion of patients on phosphate binder therapy. The model assumed equivalent efficacy and cost neutrality between FC and other phosphate binders. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted by varying model inputs. Results: When FC was compared to other phosphate binders, the monthly cost of ESA and IV iron per 500 patients with ESRD (85% treated with phosphate binders) was reduced by 8.15% and 33.2%, respectively. When incorporated into the total cost of dialysis for patients with ESRD (dialysis, ESA, and IV iron), the decrease in the monthly cost of dialysis care was US$80,214 per 500 ESRD patients. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that a plan serving 500 dialysis patients could save between US$626,000 and US$1,106,000 annually with the use of FC. Conclusion: The use of FC in ESRD patients with hyperphosphatemia may help reduce treatment costs. Keywords: phosphate binders, hyperphosphatemia, end-stage renal disease, dialysis, hemodialysis
url http://www.dovepress.com/reduced-use-of-erythropoiesis-stimulating-agents-and-intravenous-iron--a12911
work_keys_str_mv AT mutellr reduceduseoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsandintravenousironwithferriccitrateamanagedcarecostoffsetmodel
AT rubinjl reduceduseoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsandintravenousironwithferriccitrateamanagedcarecostoffsetmodel
AT bondtc reduceduseoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsandintravenousironwithferriccitrateamanagedcarecostoffsetmodel
AT maynet reduceduseoferythropoiesisstimulatingagentsandintravenousironwithferriccitrateamanagedcarecostoffsetmodel
_version_ 1725846324725678080