Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion

Introduction: When cytology for pleural fluid is nondiagnostic, thoracoscopy or cutting-needle pleural biopsy or closed percutaneous needle biopsy using Abrams needle (ANPB) can be used to obtain tissue samples. Ultrasound guidance for biopsies performed with an Abrams needle can be used to increase...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Essam G. Hassanein, Anwar A. El Ganady, Mona S. El Hoshy, Mohammad S. Ashry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-07-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763816302084
id doaj-ddcb843ad6344ce8a0d7e3e535539c17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddcb843ad6344ce8a0d7e3e535539c172020-11-24T21:15:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsEgyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis0422-76382017-07-0166343544010.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.09.003Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusionEssam G. Hassanein0Anwar A. El Ganady1Mona S. El Hoshy2Mohammad S. Ashry3Chest Disease Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptChest Disease Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptChest Disease Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EgyptGamal Abdel Nasser Health Insurance Hospital, Alexandria, EgyptIntroduction: When cytology for pleural fluid is nondiagnostic, thoracoscopy or cutting-needle pleural biopsy or closed percutaneous needle biopsy using Abrams needle (ANPB) can be used to obtain tissue samples. Ultrasound guidance for biopsies performed with an Abrams needle can be used to increase the diagnostic yield of this traditional method. Aim of the study: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic validity of ANPB under ultrasound guidance (US-ANPB) with that of medical thoracoscopy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: 30 patients with recurrent exudative pleural effusion of undetermined etiology that have undergone cytologic analysis and could not be diagnosed were included in the study and divided into 2 groups, Group I who underwent medical thoracoscopy for diagnosis (n = 15) and Group II who underwent ultrasound-guided Abrams needle biopsy for diagnosis (n = 15). Comparison between the two groups was drawn in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and complications associated with the methods used. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic thoracoscopy in group I was 100% & 100% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-guided Abrams needle in group II was 100% & 100% respectively. No difference was identified between the sensitivities of the two methods. Complications of both groups were of low rate and tolerable. Conclusion: If US guidance can be used for biopsies performed with an Abrams needle, the yield of this traditional method can be increased. The use of US-guided Abram’s needle pleural biopsy is simple, safe and well tolerated.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763816302084
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Essam G. Hassanein
Anwar A. El Ganady
Mona S. El Hoshy
Mohammad S. Ashry
spellingShingle Essam G. Hassanein
Anwar A. El Ganady
Mona S. El Hoshy
Mohammad S. Ashry
Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
author_facet Essam G. Hassanein
Anwar A. El Ganady
Mona S. El Hoshy
Mohammad S. Ashry
author_sort Essam G. Hassanein
title Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
title_short Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
title_full Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
title_fullStr Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
title_sort comparative study between the use of image guided pleural biopsy using abram’s needle and medical thoracoscope in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis
issn 0422-7638
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Introduction: When cytology for pleural fluid is nondiagnostic, thoracoscopy or cutting-needle pleural biopsy or closed percutaneous needle biopsy using Abrams needle (ANPB) can be used to obtain tissue samples. Ultrasound guidance for biopsies performed with an Abrams needle can be used to increase the diagnostic yield of this traditional method. Aim of the study: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic validity of ANPB under ultrasound guidance (US-ANPB) with that of medical thoracoscopy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: 30 patients with recurrent exudative pleural effusion of undetermined etiology that have undergone cytologic analysis and could not be diagnosed were included in the study and divided into 2 groups, Group I who underwent medical thoracoscopy for diagnosis (n = 15) and Group II who underwent ultrasound-guided Abrams needle biopsy for diagnosis (n = 15). Comparison between the two groups was drawn in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and complications associated with the methods used. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic thoracoscopy in group I was 100% & 100% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-guided Abrams needle in group II was 100% & 100% respectively. No difference was identified between the sensitivities of the two methods. Complications of both groups were of low rate and tolerable. Conclusion: If US guidance can be used for biopsies performed with an Abrams needle, the yield of this traditional method can be increased. The use of US-guided Abram’s needle pleural biopsy is simple, safe and well tolerated.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0422763816302084
work_keys_str_mv AT essamghassanein comparativestudybetweentheuseofimageguidedpleuralbiopsyusingabramsneedleandmedicalthoracoscopeindiagnosisofexudativepleuraleffusion
AT anwaraelganady comparativestudybetweentheuseofimageguidedpleuralbiopsyusingabramsneedleandmedicalthoracoscopeindiagnosisofexudativepleuraleffusion
AT monaselhoshy comparativestudybetweentheuseofimageguidedpleuralbiopsyusingabramsneedleandmedicalthoracoscopeindiagnosisofexudativepleuraleffusion
AT mohammadsashry comparativestudybetweentheuseofimageguidedpleuralbiopsyusingabramsneedleandmedicalthoracoscopeindiagnosisofexudativepleuraleffusion
_version_ 1716744347623358464