Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account

The complex pattern of exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony is taken to be one of the strong empirical arguments for an OT-system with lexically indexed constraints that are locally restricted (e.g. Mahanta 2008; 2012; Pater 2010). In contrast, we argue that the two exceptionality patterns in As...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sören Eggert Tebay, Eva Zimmermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-10-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/951
id doaj-ddc6fbaf60424994a215bd914b85a176
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddc6fbaf60424994a215bd914b85a1762021-09-02T18:09:42ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-10-015110.5334/gjgl.951551Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological accountSören Eggert Tebay0Eva Zimmermann1Leipzig University, LeipzigLeipzig University, LeipzigThe complex pattern of exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony is taken to be one of the strong empirical arguments for an OT-system with lexically indexed constraints that are locally restricted (e.g. Mahanta 2008; 2012; Pater 2010). In contrast, we argue that the two exceptionality patterns in Assamese are not an argument for the assumption of lexically indexed constraints but instead fall out as an epiphenomenon from well-known mechanisms of phonology. We present two possible purely phonological reanalyses, each assuming a different vowel feature system: One based on floating features and constraint ganging and another based on floating features and underspecification. These phonological reanalyses have important consequences not only for the argument of a strictly modular phonology that disallows any reference to morpho-syntactic features (e.g. Bermúdez-Otero 2012; Bye & Svenonius 2012), they also shed new light on the possible different sources of apparent exceptionality. More concretely, both reanalyses take the exceptional trigger for vowel harmony to be a standard instance of an unassociated feature that needs to dock to a host. An additional exceptional undergoer for another vowel harmony process receives two different interpretations that depend on the assumed vowel feature system: It is either predicted from simple underspecification that makes vowels without contrasting counterparts more prone to phonological changes or it is interpreted as a phonologically Derived Environment Effects that easily falls out from constraint ganging in Harmonic Grammar (Legendre et al. 1990; Smolensky & Legendre 2006; Potts et al. 2010).https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/951exceptionalityvowel harmonyassamesederived environment effectsharmonic grammar
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sören Eggert Tebay
Eva Zimmermann
spellingShingle Sören Eggert Tebay
Eva Zimmermann
Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
Glossa
exceptionality
vowel harmony
assamese
derived environment effects
harmonic grammar
author_facet Sören Eggert Tebay
Eva Zimmermann
author_sort Sören Eggert Tebay
title Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
title_short Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
title_full Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
title_fullStr Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
title_full_unstemmed Exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony: A phonological account
title_sort exceptionality in assamese vowel harmony: a phonological account
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-10-01
description The complex pattern of exceptionality in Assamese vowel harmony is taken to be one of the strong empirical arguments for an OT-system with lexically indexed constraints that are locally restricted (e.g. Mahanta 2008; 2012; Pater 2010). In contrast, we argue that the two exceptionality patterns in Assamese are not an argument for the assumption of lexically indexed constraints but instead fall out as an epiphenomenon from well-known mechanisms of phonology. We present two possible purely phonological reanalyses, each assuming a different vowel feature system: One based on floating features and constraint ganging and another based on floating features and underspecification. These phonological reanalyses have important consequences not only for the argument of a strictly modular phonology that disallows any reference to morpho-syntactic features (e.g. Bermúdez-Otero 2012; Bye & Svenonius 2012), they also shed new light on the possible different sources of apparent exceptionality. More concretely, both reanalyses take the exceptional trigger for vowel harmony to be a standard instance of an unassociated feature that needs to dock to a host. An additional exceptional undergoer for another vowel harmony process receives two different interpretations that depend on the assumed vowel feature system: It is either predicted from simple underspecification that makes vowels without contrasting counterparts more prone to phonological changes or it is interpreted as a phonologically Derived Environment Effects that easily falls out from constraint ganging in Harmonic Grammar (Legendre et al. 1990; Smolensky & Legendre 2006; Potts et al. 2010).
topic exceptionality
vowel harmony
assamese
derived environment effects
harmonic grammar
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/951
work_keys_str_mv AT soreneggerttebay exceptionalityinassamesevowelharmonyaphonologicalaccount
AT evazimmermann exceptionalityinassamesevowelharmonyaphonologicalaccount
_version_ 1721171796325040128