{Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method

We present our {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} model in which historically existing boundaries between academic research and everyday teaching are considered. In coteaching, all individuals (teachers, teachers in training, supervisors, and researchers) participate in assisting students to lea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolff-Michael Roth, Daniel V. Lawless, Kenneth Tobin
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2000-12-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1054
id doaj-ddc4b73c519c4b90a3b06b09d1c55c61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddc4b73c519c4b90a3b06b09d1c55c612020-11-25T00:17:29ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272000-12-01131020{Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic MethodWolff-Michael Roth0Daniel V. Lawless1Kenneth Tobin2University of VictoriaUniversity of VictoriaThe City University of New YorkWe present our {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} model in which historically existing boundaries between academic research and everyday teaching are considered. In coteaching, all individuals (teachers, teachers in training, supervisors, and researchers) participate in assisting students to learn; sitting on the sidelines and watching (objectifying) others is not permitted. In cogenerative dialoguing, these individuals and student representatives talk about their experience of teaching and learning in order to develop generalizations that open new possibilities for future action. On the basis of these generalizations and new action possibilities, changes are brought about in the environment to further enhance students' learning. Thus, {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} serves multiple purposes: besides the obvious context for teaching in a collective manner, it provides a context to research teaching, induct new teachers, supervise new and practicing teachers, assist teachers in development (that is, learning to teach). The structure of the {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} model is parallel to two dialectical pairs of concepts, {praxis | praxeology} and {understanding | explanation}, central to our epistemology and methodology, respectively. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003372http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1054theory-practice gappraxisdialectical methodresearch on teachingand learning to teach
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wolff-Michael Roth
Daniel V. Lawless
Kenneth Tobin
spellingShingle Wolff-Michael Roth
Daniel V. Lawless
Kenneth Tobin
{Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
theory-practice gap
praxis
dialectical method
research on teaching
and learning to teach
author_facet Wolff-Michael Roth
Daniel V. Lawless
Kenneth Tobin
author_sort Wolff-Michael Roth
title {Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
title_short {Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
title_full {Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
title_fullStr {Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
title_full_unstemmed {Coteaching | Cogenerative Dialoguing} as Praxis of Dialectic Method
title_sort {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} as praxis of dialectic method
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2000-12-01
description We present our {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} model in which historically existing boundaries between academic research and everyday teaching are considered. In coteaching, all individuals (teachers, teachers in training, supervisors, and researchers) participate in assisting students to learn; sitting on the sidelines and watching (objectifying) others is not permitted. In cogenerative dialoguing, these individuals and student representatives talk about their experience of teaching and learning in order to develop generalizations that open new possibilities for future action. On the basis of these generalizations and new action possibilities, changes are brought about in the environment to further enhance students' learning. Thus, {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} serves multiple purposes: besides the obvious context for teaching in a collective manner, it provides a context to research teaching, induct new teachers, supervise new and practicing teachers, assist teachers in development (that is, learning to teach). The structure of the {coteaching | cogenerative dialoguing} model is parallel to two dialectical pairs of concepts, {praxis | praxeology} and {understanding | explanation}, central to our epistemology and methodology, respectively. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0003372
topic theory-practice gap
praxis
dialectical method
research on teaching
and learning to teach
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1054
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffmichaelroth coteachingcogenerativedialoguingaspraxisofdialecticmethod
AT danielvlawless coteachingcogenerativedialoguingaspraxisofdialecticmethod
AT kennethtobin coteachingcogenerativedialoguingaspraxisofdialecticmethod
_version_ 1725379555120644096