The Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor Does Not (Usually) Approximate the Date of Divergence.
With the advent of more sophisticated models and increase in computational power, an ever-growing amount of information can be extracted from DNA sequence data. In particular, recent advances have allowed researchers to estimate the date of historical events for a group of interest including time to...
Main Author: | James B Pettengill |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4537086?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Formal Comment to Pettengill: The Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor Does Not (Usually) Approximate the Date of Divergence.
by: Mark Achtman, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Evidence for the Extensive Conservation of Mechanisms of Ovule Integument Development Since the Most Recent Common Ancestor of Living Angiosperms
by: Gontran Arnault, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Dating Divergence Times in Phylogenies
by: Anderson, Cajsa Lisa
Published: (2007) -
Dating the time of viral subtype divergence
by: She Zhen-Su, et al.
Published: (2008-06-01) -
The TERB1-TERB2-MAJIN complex of mouse meiotic telomeres dates back to the common ancestor of metazoans
by: Irene da Cruz, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)