How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?

Abstract The importance of air‐sea coupling in the simulation and prediction of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) has been well established. However, it remains unclear how air‐sea coupling modulates the convection and related oceanic features on the subdaily scale. Based on a regional cloud‐permi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning Zhao, Tomoe Nasuno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-04-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002058
id doaj-dda9cbd678214b2b9acffab477b7678d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dda9cbd678214b2b9acffab477b7678d2020-11-25T03:52:46ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662020-04-01124n/an/a10.1029/2020MS002058How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?Ning Zhao0Tomoe Nasuno1Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology Yokosuka JapanJapan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology Yokosuka JapanAbstract The importance of air‐sea coupling in the simulation and prediction of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) has been well established. However, it remains unclear how air‐sea coupling modulates the convection and related oceanic features on the subdaily scale. Based on a regional cloud‐permitting coupled model, we evaluated the impact of the air‐sea coupling on the convection during the convectively active phase of the MJO by varying the coupling frequency. The model successfully reproduced the atmospheric and oceanic variations observed by satellite and in situ measurements but with some quantitative biases. According to the sensitivity experiments, we found that stronger convection was mainly caused by the higher sea surface temperatures (SSTs) generated in high‐frequency coupled experiments, especially when the coupling frequency was 1 hr or shorter. A lower coupling frequency would generate the phase lags in the diurnal cycle of SST and related turbulent heat fluxes. Our analyses further demonstrated that the phase‐lagged diurnal cycle of SST suppressed deep convection through a decrease in daytime moistening in the lower troposphere. Meanwhile, in the upper ocean, the high‐frequency air‐sea coupling helped maintain the shallower mixed and isothermal layers by diurnal heating and cooling at the sea surface, which led to a higher mean SST. In contrast, the low‐frequency coupled experiments underestimated the SST and therefore convective activities. Overall, our results demonstrated that high‐frequency air‐sea coupling (1 hr or shorter) could improve the reproducibility of the intensity and temporal variation in both diurnal convection and upper ocean processes.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002058Madden‐Julian Oscillationair‐sea couplingcoupling frequencyconvectionupper ocean
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ning Zhao
Tomoe Nasuno
spellingShingle Ning Zhao
Tomoe Nasuno
How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Madden‐Julian Oscillation
air‐sea coupling
coupling frequency
convection
upper ocean
author_facet Ning Zhao
Tomoe Nasuno
author_sort Ning Zhao
title How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
title_short How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
title_full How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
title_fullStr How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
title_full_unstemmed How Does the Air‐Sea Coupling Frequency Affect Convection During the MJO Passage?
title_sort how does the air‐sea coupling frequency affect convection during the mjo passage?
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
issn 1942-2466
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract The importance of air‐sea coupling in the simulation and prediction of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) has been well established. However, it remains unclear how air‐sea coupling modulates the convection and related oceanic features on the subdaily scale. Based on a regional cloud‐permitting coupled model, we evaluated the impact of the air‐sea coupling on the convection during the convectively active phase of the MJO by varying the coupling frequency. The model successfully reproduced the atmospheric and oceanic variations observed by satellite and in situ measurements but with some quantitative biases. According to the sensitivity experiments, we found that stronger convection was mainly caused by the higher sea surface temperatures (SSTs) generated in high‐frequency coupled experiments, especially when the coupling frequency was 1 hr or shorter. A lower coupling frequency would generate the phase lags in the diurnal cycle of SST and related turbulent heat fluxes. Our analyses further demonstrated that the phase‐lagged diurnal cycle of SST suppressed deep convection through a decrease in daytime moistening in the lower troposphere. Meanwhile, in the upper ocean, the high‐frequency air‐sea coupling helped maintain the shallower mixed and isothermal layers by diurnal heating and cooling at the sea surface, which led to a higher mean SST. In contrast, the low‐frequency coupled experiments underestimated the SST and therefore convective activities. Overall, our results demonstrated that high‐frequency air‐sea coupling (1 hr or shorter) could improve the reproducibility of the intensity and temporal variation in both diurnal convection and upper ocean processes.
topic Madden‐Julian Oscillation
air‐sea coupling
coupling frequency
convection
upper ocean
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002058
work_keys_str_mv AT ningzhao howdoestheairseacouplingfrequencyaffectconvectionduringthemjopassage
AT tomoenasuno howdoestheairseacouplingfrequencyaffectconvectionduringthemjopassage
_version_ 1724481024481558528