Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS

Using radar observations, the performances of the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) and an indirect three-dimensional variational (3DVar) data assimilation method were compared for a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that occurred in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains, Colorado (USA). The resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shibo Gao, Jinzhong Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694295
id doaj-dda4683a7d264d0d9e8f7078adf6a526
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dda4683a7d264d0d9e8f7078adf6a5262020-11-24T21:56:49ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172018-01-01201810.1155/2018/86942958694295Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCSShibo Gao0Jinzhong Min1Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster (CICFEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaKey Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster (CICFEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaUsing radar observations, the performances of the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) and an indirect three-dimensional variational (3DVar) data assimilation method were compared for a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that occurred in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains, Colorado (USA). The results showed that the root mean square innovations (RMSIs) of EnSRF were lower than 3DVar for radar reflectivity and radial velocity and that the spread of EnSRF was generally consistent with its RMSIs. EnSRF substantially improved the analysis of the MCS compared with an experiment without radar data assimilation, and it produced a slight but noticeable improvement over 3DVar in terms of both coverage and intensity. Forecast results initiated from the final analysis revealed that EnSRF generally produced the best prediction of the MCS, with improved quantitative reflectivity and precipitation forecast skills. EnSRF also demonstrated better performance than 3DVar in the prediction of neighborhood probability for reflectivity at thresholds of 20 and 35 dBZ, which better matched the observed radar reflectivity in terms of both shape and extension. Additionally, the humidity, temperature, and wind fields were also improved by EnSRF; the largest error reduction was found in the water vapor field near the surface and at upper levels.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694295
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shibo Gao
Jinzhong Min
spellingShingle Shibo Gao
Jinzhong Min
Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
Advances in Meteorology
author_facet Shibo Gao
Jinzhong Min
author_sort Shibo Gao
title Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
title_short Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
title_full Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
title_fullStr Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 3DVar and EnSRF Data Assimilation Using Radar Observations for the Analysis and Prediction of an MCS
title_sort comparison of 3dvar and ensrf data assimilation using radar observations for the analysis and prediction of an mcs
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Meteorology
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Using radar observations, the performances of the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) and an indirect three-dimensional variational (3DVar) data assimilation method were compared for a mesoscale convective system (MCS) that occurred in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains, Colorado (USA). The results showed that the root mean square innovations (RMSIs) of EnSRF were lower than 3DVar for radar reflectivity and radial velocity and that the spread of EnSRF was generally consistent with its RMSIs. EnSRF substantially improved the analysis of the MCS compared with an experiment without radar data assimilation, and it produced a slight but noticeable improvement over 3DVar in terms of both coverage and intensity. Forecast results initiated from the final analysis revealed that EnSRF generally produced the best prediction of the MCS, with improved quantitative reflectivity and precipitation forecast skills. EnSRF also demonstrated better performance than 3DVar in the prediction of neighborhood probability for reflectivity at thresholds of 20 and 35 dBZ, which better matched the observed radar reflectivity in terms of both shape and extension. Additionally, the humidity, temperature, and wind fields were also improved by EnSRF; the largest error reduction was found in the water vapor field near the surface and at upper levels.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8694295
work_keys_str_mv AT shibogao comparisonof3dvarandensrfdataassimilationusingradarobservationsfortheanalysisandpredictionofanmcs
AT jinzhongmin comparisonof3dvarandensrfdataassimilationusingradarobservationsfortheanalysisandpredictionofanmcs
_version_ 1725856953310117888