Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations

A method to compare upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) from satellite and radiosonde data has been applied to the European radiosonde stations. The method uses microwave data as a benchmark for monitoring the performance of the stations. The present study utilizes three years (2001-2003) of data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. O. John, S. A. Buehler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1843/2005/acp-5-1843-2005.pdf
id doaj-dda04f9032ab42afb628208263df3c2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dda04f9032ab42afb628208263df3c2d2020-11-25T00:38:59ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242005-01-015718431853Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stationsV. O. JohnS. A. BuehlerA method to compare upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) from satellite and radiosonde data has been applied to the European radiosonde stations. The method uses microwave data as a benchmark for monitoring the performance of the stations. The present study utilizes three years (2001-2003) of data from channel 18 (183.31±1.00 GHz) of the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B) aboard the satellites NOAA-15 and NOAA-16. The comparison is done in the radiance space, the radiosonde data were transformed to the channel radiances using a radiative transfer model. The comparison results confirm that there is a dry bias in the UTH measured by the radiosondes. This bias is highly variable among the stations and the years. This variability is attributed mainly to the differences in the radiosonde humidity measurements. The analysis also shows a difference between daytime and nighttime soundings which is attributed to radiation error in the radiosonde data. The dry bias due to this error alone correspond to approximately 11% relative error in the UTH measurements.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1843/2005/acp-5-1843-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. O. John
S. A. Buehler
spellingShingle V. O. John
S. A. Buehler
Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet V. O. John
S. A. Buehler
author_sort V. O. John
title Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
title_short Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
title_full Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
title_fullStr Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: A survey of European stations
title_sort comparison of microwave satellite humidity data and radiosonde profiles: a survey of european stations
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2005-01-01
description A method to compare upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) from satellite and radiosonde data has been applied to the European radiosonde stations. The method uses microwave data as a benchmark for monitoring the performance of the stations. The present study utilizes three years (2001-2003) of data from channel 18 (183.31±1.00 GHz) of the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B) aboard the satellites NOAA-15 and NOAA-16. The comparison is done in the radiance space, the radiosonde data were transformed to the channel radiances using a radiative transfer model. The comparison results confirm that there is a dry bias in the UTH measured by the radiosondes. This bias is highly variable among the stations and the years. This variability is attributed mainly to the differences in the radiosonde humidity measurements. The analysis also shows a difference between daytime and nighttime soundings which is attributed to radiation error in the radiosonde data. The dry bias due to this error alone correspond to approximately 11% relative error in the UTH measurements.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1843/2005/acp-5-1843-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vojohn comparisonofmicrowavesatellitehumiditydataandradiosondeprofilesasurveyofeuropeanstations
AT sabuehler comparisonofmicrowavesatellitehumiditydataandradiosondeprofilesasurveyofeuropeanstations
_version_ 1725295479418257408