The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture

At the verge of the crisis of production and knowledge, the discourse of university has shown how a modernist theoretical insight upon the nature of subjectivity could have been integrated with a social concern. It is this concern that also signifies the evolution of modern analysis throughout the i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Serdar Erişen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2020-07-01
Series:Athens Journal of Architecture
Online Access:https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2020-6-3-5-Erisen.pdf
id doaj-dd895d4ee5bc456ea90991da3886d2cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd895d4ee5bc456ea90991da3886d2cc2020-11-25T04:09:11ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722407-94722020-07-0163293318https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.6-3-5The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of ArchitectureSerdar Erişen0Research Assistant, Middle East Technical University, TurkeyAt the verge of the crisis of production and knowledge, the discourse of university has shown how a modernist theoretical insight upon the nature of subjectivity could have been integrated with a social concern. It is this concern that also signifies the evolution of modern analysis throughout the inquiry of the socio-cultural and political collectivity. The discourse of university in the reinterpretation of the modernist production and knowledge, in that sense, not only gives way to understand the societal volatility because of the problems of disintegration but also reveals what is the real behind those problems. Although their coexisting circumstances do not directly correspond to May 1968 events, the engaged conjecture of the Free University of Berlin and Eishin Campus in Japan are two very distinct campus projects that can be analyzed with such an inquiry throughout the discourse of university. They are not only significant to take a traditional or cultural mode of making into account of practicing, as either modernist or vernacular, but also consequential for integrating the social concern of a collective demand that having a very active role in the design progress of those projects. It is such that, the projects give great clues about the re-interpretation of modern mode of making and generation of knowledge under the light of the transformation of subjectivity, as the discourse of university. Accordingly, the novel interpretation of the spatial production that coexists with the changing social and environmental conditions is necessary for the assessment of the information age.https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2020-6-3-5-Erisen.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Serdar Erişen
spellingShingle Serdar Erişen
The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
Athens Journal of Architecture
author_facet Serdar Erişen
author_sort Serdar Erişen
title The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
title_short The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
title_full The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
title_fullStr The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
title_full_unstemmed The Architecture of Knowledge from the Knowledge of Architecture
title_sort architecture of knowledge from the knowledge of architecture
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of Architecture
issn 2407-9472
2407-9472
publishDate 2020-07-01
description At the verge of the crisis of production and knowledge, the discourse of university has shown how a modernist theoretical insight upon the nature of subjectivity could have been integrated with a social concern. It is this concern that also signifies the evolution of modern analysis throughout the inquiry of the socio-cultural and political collectivity. The discourse of university in the reinterpretation of the modernist production and knowledge, in that sense, not only gives way to understand the societal volatility because of the problems of disintegration but also reveals what is the real behind those problems. Although their coexisting circumstances do not directly correspond to May 1968 events, the engaged conjecture of the Free University of Berlin and Eishin Campus in Japan are two very distinct campus projects that can be analyzed with such an inquiry throughout the discourse of university. They are not only significant to take a traditional or cultural mode of making into account of practicing, as either modernist or vernacular, but also consequential for integrating the social concern of a collective demand that having a very active role in the design progress of those projects. It is such that, the projects give great clues about the re-interpretation of modern mode of making and generation of knowledge under the light of the transformation of subjectivity, as the discourse of university. Accordingly, the novel interpretation of the spatial production that coexists with the changing social and environmental conditions is necessary for the assessment of the information age.
url https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2020-6-3-5-Erisen.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT serdarerisen thearchitectureofknowledgefromtheknowledgeofarchitecture
AT serdarerisen architectureofknowledgefromtheknowledgeofarchitecture
_version_ 1724422890010443776