Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Jaguste |
id |
doaj-dd876600e5aa4dcab4355257d7e6888a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-dd876600e5aa4dcab4355257d7e6888a2020-11-25T00:28:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852019-01-01102576110.4103/picr.PICR_18_18Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementationVeena Shridhar JagusteThe United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies and programs. The acceptance and implementation across the organizations have been variable in terms of pace and methodology. Published literature, commentaries, and views through Internet search were reviewed to understand the perceptions about RBM of different key stakeholders whose function has been significantly impacted, as these highlight ground-level challenges while implementing this major change. Some solutions are proposed to address these perceptions and challenges, as sooner than later RBM will become a way of life, given that recent ICH E6, revision 2 (November 2016) includes RBM in the document. Conceptual clarity, change management, skillset, and capacity building will be the key areas of focus to make RBM successful.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=JagusteCapacity buildingchange managementclinical research associatesclinical sitesdata managersmedical monitorsperceptionsrisk-based monitoringskillset |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Veena Shridhar Jaguste |
spellingShingle |
Veena Shridhar Jaguste Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation Perspectives in Clinical Research Capacity building change management clinical research associates clinical sites data managers medical monitors perceptions risk-based monitoring skillset |
author_facet |
Veena Shridhar Jaguste |
author_sort |
Veena Shridhar Jaguste |
title |
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
title_short |
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
title_full |
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
title_fullStr |
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
title_sort |
risk-based monitoring: review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Perspectives in Clinical Research |
issn |
2229-3485 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies and programs. The acceptance and implementation across the organizations have been variable in terms of pace and methodology. Published literature, commentaries, and views through Internet search were reviewed to understand the perceptions about RBM of different key stakeholders whose function has been significantly impacted, as these highlight ground-level challenges while implementing this major change. Some solutions are proposed to address these perceptions and challenges, as sooner than later RBM will become a way of life, given that recent ICH E6, revision 2 (November 2016) includes RBM in the document. Conceptual clarity, change management, skillset, and capacity building will be the key areas of focus to make RBM successful. |
topic |
Capacity building change management clinical research associates clinical sites data managers medical monitors perceptions risk-based monitoring skillset |
url |
http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Jaguste |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT veenashridharjaguste riskbasedmonitoringreviewofthecurrentperceptionsandtowardeffectiveimplementation |
_version_ |
1725336647666499584 |