Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation

The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Veena Shridhar Jaguste
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Perspectives in Clinical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Jaguste
id doaj-dd876600e5aa4dcab4355257d7e6888a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dd876600e5aa4dcab4355257d7e6888a2020-11-25T00:28:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852019-01-01102576110.4103/picr.PICR_18_18Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementationVeena Shridhar JagusteThe United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies and programs. The acceptance and implementation across the organizations have been variable in terms of pace and methodology. Published literature, commentaries, and views through Internet search were reviewed to understand the perceptions about RBM of different key stakeholders whose function has been significantly impacted, as these highlight ground-level challenges while implementing this major change. Some solutions are proposed to address these perceptions and challenges, as sooner than later RBM will become a way of life, given that recent ICH E6, revision 2 (November 2016) includes RBM in the document. Conceptual clarity, change management, skillset, and capacity building will be the key areas of focus to make RBM successful.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=JagusteCapacity buildingchange managementclinical research associatesclinical sitesdata managersmedical monitorsperceptionsrisk-based monitoringskillset
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Veena Shridhar Jaguste
spellingShingle Veena Shridhar Jaguste
Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Capacity building
change management
clinical research associates
clinical sites
data managers
medical monitors
perceptions
risk-based monitoring
skillset
author_facet Veena Shridhar Jaguste
author_sort Veena Shridhar Jaguste
title Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
title_short Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
title_full Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
title_fullStr Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
title_full_unstemmed Risk-based monitoring: Review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
title_sort risk-based monitoring: review of the current perceptions and toward effective implementation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Perspectives in Clinical Research
issn 2229-3485
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies and programs. The acceptance and implementation across the organizations have been variable in terms of pace and methodology. Published literature, commentaries, and views through Internet search were reviewed to understand the perceptions about RBM of different key stakeholders whose function has been significantly impacted, as these highlight ground-level challenges while implementing this major change. Some solutions are proposed to address these perceptions and challenges, as sooner than later RBM will become a way of life, given that recent ICH E6, revision 2 (November 2016) includes RBM in the document. Conceptual clarity, change management, skillset, and capacity building will be the key areas of focus to make RBM successful.
topic Capacity building
change management
clinical research associates
clinical sites
data managers
medical monitors
perceptions
risk-based monitoring
skillset
url http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2019;volume=10;issue=2;spage=57;epage=61;aulast=Jaguste
work_keys_str_mv AT veenashridharjaguste riskbasedmonitoringreviewofthecurrentperceptionsandtowardeffectiveimplementation
_version_ 1725336647666499584