Hypotensive anaesthesia for spine surgery--nitroglycerin vs halothane.

Thirty patients (ASA I or II) requiring spine surgery under general anesthesia were studied. To induce hypotension, halothane 0.5 to 2.5% (n = 15) or nitroglycerin infusion (1-2 micrograms/kg/min) (n = 15) was used. The parameters studied were blood pressure, blood loss, operating time an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kadam P, Saksena S, Jagtap S, Pantavaidya S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 1993-01-01
Series:Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=1993;volume=39;issue=1;spage=26;epage=8;aulast=Kadam
Description
Summary:Thirty patients (ASA I or II) requiring spine surgery under general anesthesia were studied. To induce hypotension, halothane 0.5 to 2.5% (n = 15) or nitroglycerin infusion (1-2 micrograms/kg/min) (n = 15) was used. The parameters studied were blood pressure, blood loss, operating time and recovery score. The systolic blood pressure was maintained between 80-100 mmHg during surgery in both the groups. The blood loss with nitroglycerin was significantly less (202 +/- 114 ml) than halothane group (602 +/- 312 ml). All the patients were alert at the end of surgery in the nitroglycerin group (recovery score 9.8 +/- 0.76) as against the halothane group (7.98 +/- 0.9 p < 0.01). Tachycardia or tachyphylaxis was not observed with nitroglycerin. This study suggests that continuous intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin is effective and safe in reducing blood loss and operating time during spine surgery.
ISSN:0022-3859
0972-2823